Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00574
Original file (BC-2007-00574.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-00574
            INDEX CODE:  128.14

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be paid Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the BAH I rate, rather
than the BAH II rate, along with Overseas Housing Allowance  and  Cost
of Living Adjustments (OHA/COLA) at rates listed for the  Puerto  Rico
(PR) area,  rather  than  rates  for  the  Continental  United  States
(CONUS), between 30 September 2004 and 1 February 2006.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

An earlier directive by the AFBCMR placed him on continued active duty
from 30 September 2004 until his retirement for length of service on 1
February 2006.  During the active duty continuation, he was  paid  BAH
II instead of the BAH I that he was entitled to.  Additionally, he was
not paid OHA/COLA for the Puerto Rico area.

In support of his appeal, the applicant has  provided  copies  of  the
earlier AFBCMR case and related correspondence  between  him  and  the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant, a retired member of the Puerto Rico Air National  Guard
(PRANG) applied to the AFBCMR  on  19  November  2004  for  additional
active duty time  associated  with  a  sanctuary  issue.   The  AFBCMR
approved his request and directed he be continued on active  duty  for
an amount of time that enabled him to retire  for  length  of  service
effective 1 February 2006.  During the time the AFBCMR  continued  him
on active duty, he received BAH II at the with-dependent  rate,  Basic
Allowance for Subsistence  (BAS)  and  Aviator  Career  Incentive  Pay
(ACIP) from 1 October 2004 through 31 January 2006, less  any  offsets
for civilian earnings during that time frame.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1P0F recommends the applicant’s  request  be  partially  granted.
A1P0F agrees the applicant should have been paid at  the  BAH  I  rate
rather than the BAH II rate but contends the applicant was entitled to
CONUS COLA, rather than the OHA/COLA for the PR area that he requests.

A1P0F’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
13 July 2007 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice regarding his request for Overseas
Housing Allowance and Cost of  Living  Allowance  (OHA/COLA)  for  the
Puerto  Rico  area.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's  complete
submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we  agree  with
the opinion and recommendation of the Air  National  Guard  office  of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or
injustice.  He was not eligible for OHA/COLA as he  lived  in  Florida
and not in Puerto Rico.  Consequently, he  was  correctly  paid  CONUS
COLA during the continuation period.  Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting payment of OHA/COLA sought in this application.

4.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice in regard to his  request  to  receive
BAH I rather than BAH II.  BAH I was a rate paid to Reserve  component
personnel on active duty for more than 139 days.  Action taken  by  an
earlier Board continued him on active duty from 1 October 2004 through
31 January 2006.  The continuation resulted in him spending more  than
139 days on active duty.  He was therefore eligible to receive  BAH  I
for that extended period of time.  Therefore, we  recommend  that  the
records be corrected as indicated below.

______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that  he  was  eligible  to
receive Basic Allowance for Housing I (BAH I) from  30 September  2004
through 31 January 2006, rather than BAH II for the same time period.

______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-00574  in  Executive  Session  on  10  January  2008,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
      Mr. Mark J. Novitski, Member
      Mrs. Lea Gallogly, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 February 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1P0F, dated 21 June 07, w/atch.
    Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 July 2007.




                                   JAMES W. RUSSELL III
                                   Panel Chair



                         DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
                                WASHINGTON DC


[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary



AFBCMR BC-2007-00574




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was eligible
to receive Basic Allowance for Housing I (BAH I) from 30 September
2004 through 31 January 2006, rather than BAH II for the same time
period.





     JOE G. LINEBERGER

     Director

     Air Force Review Boards Agency


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009255C070206

    Original file (20050009255C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant and his family were stationed in Puerto Rico; that the applicant received orders, was reassigned to a dependent restricted tour, and arrived in Honduras on 16 April 2003; and that his family remained in Puerto Rico until his return to Puerto Rico on 18 May 2004. The advisory opinion offers that the evidence of record indicates that, prior to reporting to Honduras, the applicant was improperly advised that his COLA and OHA allowances would continue...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01907

    Original file (BC 2013 01907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: SAF/MRBP recommends partial relief by remitting $27,297.83 of the debt, disapproving remission of the remaining $1,604.65 of the debt, and order collection of the debt at the rate of $98.93 per month until the debt is paid. The evidence indicates the applicant was erroneously advised by the local finance office regarding his entitlements while assigned to Lajes AFB. The Remission Board found...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06094-03

    Original file (06094-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) type I at the w/dependent rate for Oakland, CA due to dependents moving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212

    Original file (2003090619C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02632

    Original file (BC-2006-02632.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 4 June 1985. Between 4 June 1989 and 3 June 1992 his record indicates service with a Reserve component where he accumulated three satisfactory years of service towards a Reserve retirement – part of which the record shows was spent in the CAANG. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016844

    Original file (20100016844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 August 2009, the LAARNG denied her request to amend her PCS orders to show a no cost/low cost move. By her own admission, she did submit a claim for mileage cost for one trip between her old and new duty locations as authorized by her PCS orders and she rented an apartment in Carville until her deployment to Iraq in July 2007, indicating she did not continue to routinely commute from her residence in New Orleans to her new duty location. That she did not use her full PCS entitlement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004856

    Original file (20120004856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * memorandum requesting sponsorship, dated 14 March 2007 * Orders 191-12, dated 9 July 2008 * Carlson Wagonlit travel itinerary/invoice, dated 29 July 2008 * DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 August 2008 * DA Form 5960, dated 11 August 2008 * DD Form 2367, dated 11 August 2008 * Orders 301-02, dated 27 October 2008 * letter from the Darton College Office of the Registrar, dated 5 October 2010 * Account summary from Midland Mortgage Company, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008520

    Original file (20110008520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was assigned to a Reserve unit in Guam when they were activated for deployment to Iraq in 2004 - 2005 and he did not receive the OHA, URMA, and COLA entitlements he was entitled to receive. However, in the interest of justice and given the advisory opinion obtained in this case, it would be appropriate to request that DFAS conduct an audit of the applicant's finance record. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05594-02

    Original file (05594-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. appropriate housing allowance in these circumstances.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00387

    Original file (BC 2013 00387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the provisions of the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) if a service member is called or ordered to active duty without a break in service and a PCS order authorizing household goods (HHG) transportation is not issued the service members BAH rate will be based (paid) on the PDS location that the service member was ordered to active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...