RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01304
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: HAROLD G. MERCER
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 October 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Silver Star Medal (SSM) for his gallant actions on
15 December 1970.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Timely submission of the SSM was not made due to the following: (1) co-
pilot on the mission was reassigned within several weeks and departed the
theatre of operations; (2) change in command structure occurred at several
levels during the time frame of two major battles and the 15 December 1970
mission; (3) drawdown of US forces in Southeast Asia (SEA); and (4)
exigencies of the mission and classified nature of the Rustic operations.
On 15 December 1970, he flew his first night Rustic mission in an O-2A
“Skymaster” as a newly assigned squadron commander of the 19th Tactical Air
Support Squadron. The Forward Air Controller (FAC) who accompanied him on
the mission was awarded the SSM based on his recommendation and was
reassigned shortly thereafter. However, the Seventh Air Force subsequently
determined that no recommendations for the SSM would be forwarded to that
headquarters under any circumstances.
In support of the appeal, the applicant’s counsel provides a statement from
the former task force commander, a narrative recommendation, a proposed
citation, his personal affidavit as a former Rustic and the unit’s Awards
and Decorations Officer, and cites several previously approved AFBCMR cases
involving similar requests from former Rustics.
The former task force commander states that he strongly supports the
request to award the applicant the SSM for his valorous actions in combat.
The FAC on the mission, who was awarded the SSM, states that on the night
in question the applicant flew his first Rustic mission while he handled
the radios and navigation. On that night, the applicant’s superb
airmanship, self control, disregard for his own safety, teamwork, and
bravery were instrumental in saving the lives of many Cambodian soldiers
and resulted in significant losses by the enemy forces. Despite the most
intense ground combat he had seen in his 10 months as an FAC and the first
the applicant had seen since his arrival in country, the applicant did an
exceptional job helping repel a potentially lethal attack by a superior
enemy ground force. They experienced heavy enemy anti-aircraft fire, 50
caliber machine gun and AK-47 fire, while the applicant was flying as close
and as low as possible to the friendly positions. During this time, the
applicant kept his composure under fire and performed a most dangerous job
under very difficult circumstances.
The former unit Awards and Decorations officer states that subsequent to
the mission, he was advised by Seventh Air Force personnel that SSM
recommendations were not to be forwarded to them under any circumstances.
Prior to that time, only one SSM was ever awarded to anyone in the unit and
that was the one recommended by the applicant for the FAC that accompanied
him on the 15 December 1970 mission. He further states there were
irregularities within the awards and decorations system that prevailed at
the time and that numerous DFC and AM submissions were either downgraded or
lost.
Counsel’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a retired colonel who served in the Republic of Vietnam
(RVN) from 21 November 1970 through 31 December 1971 at Bien Hoa and Phan
Rang Air Bases as an O-2A, OV-10A, O-1G, and EC-121D pilot and squadron
commander in support of Rustic operations. During this period he completed
a total of 183 combat missions, totaling 475.3 combat hours, for which he
was awarded two Distinguished Flying Crosses and eight Air Medals.
Headquarters Seventh Air Force special order G-1233, dated 22 April 1971,
awarded the SSM to the co-pilot/FAC of the 15 December 1970 mission for
gallantry in action while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in
an armed conflict against an opposing armed force.
On 12 April 2004, the AFBCMR favorably considered a request from a former
Rustic FAC OV-10 pilot to upgrade his Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) to
the SSM (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. In this respect, we note the
applicant is a former Rustic Forward Air Controller (FAC) O-2A pilot and
squadron commander. The evidence of record indicates that as a newly
assigned squadron commander, the applicant flew his first combat mission in
Cambodia on the night of 15 December 1970 insuring beleaguered Cambodian
ground forces located north of Phnom Penh received tactical air support.
The Cambodian ground forces were surrounded by a superior enemy ground
force comprised of Khmer Rouge and North Vietnamese regulars and in
imminent danger of being overrun. Despite intense ground combat and heavy
enemy ground-to-air anti-aircraft fire, the applicant made numerous passes
in his unarmed Cessna aircraft. With total disregard for his own safety he
unselfishly remained in the area exposing himself to enemy fire, flying as
close and as low as possible to the friendly positions on the ground,
marking enemy targets, and directing repeated tactical air strikes with
extreme accuracy. As a result of his gallantry, a potentially lethal
attack by a superior enemy ground force was quelled, saving the lives of
many Cambodian soldiers and causing enemy forces to sustain significant
losses. The unit’s former Awards and Decorations Officer states the only
SSM ever awarded to a member of their unit was the applicant’s FAC on the
mission, which the applicant had recommended for the award. He further
states that Seventh Air Force personnel subsequently advised him that SSM
recommendations were not to be forwarded for their consideration under any
circumstances. In view of this, and since the FAC on the mission was
awarded the SSM for his actions on that night, we believe it would be
unjust to deny the applicant, as the mission’s pilot, similar recognition.
In addition, this Board has considered several applications from members of
the Rustic FAC units and found their true accomplishments were not known at
the time they were considered for awards because their duties were
classified. In view of the above findings, and noting the strong support
from the former task force commander, we recommend his records be corrected
to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 April 1971, he was awarded the
Silver Star Medal for gallantry in action while serving with friendly
foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force
on 15 December 1970.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
01304 in Executive Session on 15 July 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-01304
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 22 April 1971, he was
awarded the Silver Star Medal for gallantry in action while serving with
friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing
armed force on 15 December 1970.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
The pilot of the 1 December 1971 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC, 1 OLC, and states that due to the applicant’s quick and accurate interpretation of the Cambodian Ground Commander’s requests during the mission, they were able to place seven separate sets of fighters in and around Kampong Thma as close as 100 meters of the friendly forces, preventing the overrun of the city and saving the lives of many friendly Cambodian troops. Applicant’s complete submission, with...
The pilot of the 25 August 1972 mission recommends the applicant be awarded the DFC and states that during the mission the applicant played an extraordinary role in pre-planning, coordinating and ensuring the success of reconnaissance and air strikes. As such, they believe he received sufficient recognition for his achievement during aerial flight. Of the Airborne Interpreters who participated in the Rustic Operation, the applicant is one of only two individuals who did not receive at...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02018
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Neither the applicant nor Colonel M----, the former unit Awards and Decorations Officer, realized the original submission for the DFC had been downgraded to an AM, 6 OLC. In all submissions made by the Rustic FAC Association to date, extenuating circumstances have been detailed noting that then headquarters review and decision authorities...
AFPC/DPPPR does not believe sufficient justification has been provided to show that the applicant was not recommended for the DFC because of the classified nature of his mission. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A representative of the Rustic FAC Association states that a number of interpreters having similar duties were awarded the DFC based on...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that although the 1 October 1970 mission may have been classified at the time, the proposed citation is entirely unclassified, except for identying the enemy territory as Combodia, and was unclassified at that time. AFPC/DPPPR does not believe sufficient justification has been provided to show that the applicant was not recommended for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2001-01303a
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2001-01303 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: HAROLD G. MERCER XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) awarded for actions on 23 September 1970, be upgraded to the Silver Star Medal (SSM). In addition, this Board has considered several applications from members of the Rustic...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00916
DPPPR states that many members of the decedent’s organization, Rustic FAC did not receive recognition of specific flights due to rapid mission requirements. After reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded that the decedent’s actions on 20 June 1970, justify awarding of the Silver Star Medal (SSM). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 03 JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-00916 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00915
In support of his appeal, applicant’s counsel has provided a brief that is at Exhibit A. DPPPR states that many members of the applicant’s organization, Rustic FAC (Forward Air Controller) did not receive recognition of specific flights due to rapid mission requirements. In addition, this Board has considered several applications from members of the Rustic FAC units and found that their true accomplishments were not known at the time they were considered for awards because their duties...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02156
In 1974, a recommendation to award the applicant the BSM was considered and denied by the 13th Air Force. While the applicant contends he was not submitted for any decorations because of the classified nature of his duties, many intelligence personnel were recommended for decorations during the contested period in Vietnam, and many decorations were approved. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03616
Furthermore, his medical records indicate that he had an operation. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and states, in part, that there is no evidence he was recommended for, or awarded the DFC. Should the applicant provide additional statements containing specific details regarding his...