RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01211
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Legal Aid of Manasota, Inc.
HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 October 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Section IX discharge from the Army Air Corps be upgraded to general
(under honorable conditions) in order to qualify for Veterans
Administration (VA) benefits.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believed he was no longer in the military service after early August
1942 when it was discovered that his age at the time of his enlistment was
16 ½ years versus 18 ½ years. He was informed by an officer at Wendover
Field that he was “out” without any other formality, and was separated from
service without further procedures. He was not provided any separation
compensation nor given any transportation to return to his place of
enlistment. Left in a vulnerable situation, he joined several other young
men with whom he hitch-hiked to Idaho looking for employment. He and the
other young men became involved in a robbery and were subsequently
incarcerated in Idaho for a period of one year. On 6 November 1943, he was
advised that he had never been formally discharged from the military and
was given a discharge indicating time lost under the 107th Article of War.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a signed affidavit, an
affidavit from his counsel, certificate of birth, discharge certificate,
enlistment record, and the record of the court judgment which led to his
civilian incarceration.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the limited available military records and those submitted by
the applicant, he enlisted in the Army Air Corps at the age of 18 years and
9 months on 10 January 1942 in the grade of private. He was subsequently
appointed to the grade of sergeant on 1 May 1942. The applicant was listed
as Absent Without Leave (AWOL) from 29 July 1942 to 9 February 1943. On
1 August 1942, he was reduced to the grade of private. On 21 September
1942, the applicant was sentenced to one year in a county jail for a
conviction of robbery. The applicant was dropped as a deserter on 10
February 1943.
On 8 April 1943, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of
Section IX, Paragraph 59, of Army Regulation 615-360, for reason of
conviction by a civilian court. He served for a period of 1 year, 2
months, and 10 days on active duty with 253 days lost time.
No other military service records can be located; therefore, an Air Force
advisory opinion was unable to be accomplished. The applicant did not
submit any further information surrounding his discharge.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated that on the basis of the
data furnished, they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to
the applicant.
On 14 June 2007, the applicant was given the opportunity to submit comments
about his post service activities (Exhibit C). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
None. The applicant has not shown the characterization of his discharge
was contrary to the provisions of Army Regulation 615-360, then in effect,
which provided for the issuance of a Blue Discharge Certificate from the
Army of the United States for individuals separated by reason of inaptness
or undesirable traits of character. The certificate of discharge does not
indicate any characterization of service. It was; however, issued in
accordance with the guidance contained in Army Regulation 345-470, then in
effect, as follows: the blue discharge must be used in all cases where
service has not been honest and faithful or where a character of “Fair” or
“Poor” is given, and in which a dishonorable discharge cannot be given.
Based on the presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental
affairs the discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate
directives.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Based upon the presumption of regularity
in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to the
contrary, we must assume that the applicant's characterization of discharge
was proper and in compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, based
on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to
favorably consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 9 August 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Terri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2007-01211:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 3 Apr 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dtd 14 Jun 07, w/atch.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059570C070421
He further states that he was discharged for AWOL but not for drugs. 24 October 1942 - 3 November 1942 AWOL 11 days. LOD NO EPTI.” He was also issued a WDAGO Form 56 (Discharge from the Army of the United States (blue)), a “Blue” discharge, a copy of which is not now in his file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001950
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The War Department Form 370 also shows he was discharged "not honorably" per paragraph 5b and Section VII (Desertion) of Army Regulation 615-360 (Enlisted Men - Discharge, Release from Active Duty), and he was to be issued a "blue" discharge certificate. He provides an NA Form 13038 issued on 17 January 2013 showing his service was terminated by "other than honorable discharge."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072219C070403
When the applicant informed Army officials that he could no longer perform his military duties he was separated with a less than honorable discharge with a poor characterization of service. The characterization of an “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions” discharge is a degradation of the “Blue Discharge” that he was issued at the time of discharge under regulations and policy that existed at that time. The applicant was required to appear before a board of officers to determine his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02283
He was discharged to duty on 13 April 1942. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that the applicant’s discharge should be changed to a medical discharge with compensation. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 15 Dec 03.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002760
The applicant, son of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests an upgrade of his father's other than honorable discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant states: a. The available evidence suggests that the FSM received a blue discharge because his service did not meet the criteria for an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052321C070420
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. A Certificate of Military Service prepared by the National Personnel Records Center on 29 June 1998, states that the applicant’s service was characterized as other than honorable. Historical records also show that Blue Discharges were issued to individuals whose service was not dishonorable, but were not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013340
The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. WD AGO Form 53-58 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, General Discharge), dated 28 June 1948. b. However, the applicants WD AGO Form 53-58 shows he was separated on 28 June 1948 in accordance with Army Regulation 615-368 (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character Discharge), by reason of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606716C070209
On 7 March 1944 his commanding officer recommended that the former soldier be discharged. He stated that he always had an uncontrollable temper and if anyone said anything cross to him, he would strike him. It appears that the intent of Army Regulation 635-209 was to change the policy for separating soldiers with undesirable habits and traits of character, recognizing that these unsuitable habits included chronic alcoholism, and soldiers separated for unsuitability should receive a general...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062498C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610714C070209
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. The board recommend that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-360 on account of habits and traits of character which rendered his retention in the service undesirable, and disqualified in character for service, through his own misconduct. 56 (Discharge from the Army...