RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00224
INDEX NUMBER: 124.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 July 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His medical records be amended to reflect that he was on convalescent leave
from 16 May 02 to 10 Oct 02.
Examiner’s Note: It appears the applicant is attempting to have his
medical records reflect he suffered a traumatic event and was unable to
perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for a period of 120 days as
defined under the Traumatic Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (TSGLI)
program.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In a four-page statement, the applicant provides a chronological account of
the injury he suffered while moving helicopter blades from a C-130, from
the date of his injury, 6 May 02, to the date he received his first surgery
on 10 Oct 02.
The applicant also provides a copy of the denial of his application for
benefits under the TSGLI program and a copy of his appeal of the denial.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant as a member of the Air National Guard serving in the grade of
technical sergeant (TSgt) was deployed to Operation Enduring Freedom on 9
Apr 02. While offloading helicopter blades from a C-130 on 6 May 02 with
14 other individuals, the applicant suffered a severe groin pull with onset
of acute pain in the lower back that worsened over time. The applicant
subsequently met a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and was placed on the
Temporary Disability Retired List effective 28 Feb 04.
On 11 May 05, the President signed Public Law 109-13, which included a
program designed to provide financial assistance to service members during
recovery from a serious traumatic injury (not necessarily as a result of
combat). The new insurance, Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
(TSGLI), is considered a rider to a member’s SGLI policy. TSGLI pays a
predetermined monetary benefit from $25,000 to $100,000 for covered losses
that are incurred by the member as a result of a traumatic injury. The
TSGLI program was implemented effective 1 Dec 05, and contains a
retroactive provision that applies to members who suffer a qualifying loss
as a direct result of injuries incurred in Operation IRAQI FREEDOM and
Operation ENDURING FREEDOM from 7 Oct 01 through 30 Nov 05.
Servicemembers who wish to apply for the TSGLI benefit must complete a
claim form (Part A) and a physician or other authorized medical personnel
must certify the medical portion of the claim (Part B). The service member
then forwards the claim to AFPC/DPFC for certification (Part C). The claim
is then forwarded to the Office of SGLI (OSGLI) for final disposition.
Service members may appeal claim denial to: (1) AFPC Commander for claims
denied for not meeting non-medical eligibility criteria and (2) AFPC/DPPD,
AF Physical Evaluation Board for claims denied for not meeting the required
medical eligibility criteria.
The applicant submitted a TSGLI claim on 24 Jan 06 based on his not being
able to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) due to his back injury.
His claim was not certified by his physician. The physician stated the
applicant was chronically limited with prolonged sitting, standing and
bending despite maximal attempts at pain control and surgeries to his lower
back. The physician states the applicant could perform ADLs “with
difficulty.” AFPC/DPFC certified the claim as not qualifying for a covered
loss given the recommendation from his physician and accompanying medical
documentation. OSGLI denied the claim on 30 Jun 06.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPFC recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The medical
documentation included with his claim does not document his inability to
perform at least two of six daily living activities on a continuous basis
for a period of 30 or more consecutive days.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant’s wife provided a
statement. She discusses the poor quality of medical care received by her
husband and why the documentation needed was not included in her husband’s
medical records. The applicant’s wife also provides a statement from the
physician who initiated her husband’s medical board. The doctor states the
applicant is and will remain permanently disabled.
The applicant’s wife also submitted a second statement, dated 11 May 07,
discussing the dire financial situation she and her husband are in and
requesting a prompt decision by the Board on her husband’s appeal.
The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluated this
appeal. He recommends denial of the applicant’s request.
The medical documentation from Oman, the results of MRI scanning performed
12 Jul 02 and Medical Evaluation Board documentation do not provide
sufficient evidence that supports the applicant’s report of inability to
perform activities of daily living independently between 6 May 02 and 10
Oct 02. Primary medical documentation that is likely to be determinative
is absent from the case file.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 Jun 07 for review and comment within 30 days. To date a
response has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility, and the BCMR Medical Consultant, and adopt their rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim
of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-
00224 in Executive Session on 1 August 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Mr. Don H. Kendrick, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2007-
00224 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Jan 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFC, dated 23 Feb 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Mar 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Mar 07, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant’s wife, dated 11 May 07.
Exhibit G. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
dated 7 Jun 07.
Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 Jun 07.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01167
His medical provider certified his inability to perform at least 2 of the ADL for over 90 consecutive days and that he required the assistance of another person to help him bathe from 20 Feb to 20 Aug 08. His claim for the inability to perform the ADL due to traumatic injury was not approved as the medical documentation provided did not indicate the loss met the standards for TSGLI. He submitted a TSGLI application claiming the inability to perform the ADL of bathing and dressing for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05143
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05143 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His claim for Servicemembers Group Life Insurance Traumatic Injury Protection (TSGLI) be approved. On 5 May 05, Public Law 109-13 established a traumatic injury program designed to provide financial assistance to service members during recovery from...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00608
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants counsel argues that evidence material to the claim was not considered, the relevant standards for providing ADLs loss were misapplied, and the applicants underlying traumatic injury was questioned although he received an initial payment of $25,000. The preponderance of the evidence in the applicants case proves he sustained at least 90 day ADL loss due to his traumatic...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02007
The criteria for ADL loss as it is defined in the TSGLI procedures Guide follows: A member is considered to have a loss of ADL if the member REQUIRES assistance to perform at least two of the six activities of daily living. Initial medical review of the claim the physician indicated that he would allow for the applicant requiring assistance for dressing but not bathing. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02977 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His claim under the Traumatic Servicemembers Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) Protection be approved. In this respect we note the applicant provides statements from two medical providers and his caregiver that discusses the specific limitations the applicant actually experienced and states the applicant indeed...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01789
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. In this case, there is no issue with the traumatic event element; however, the physicians that reviewed the original claim and appeal packages disagreed with the physician who certified ADL with regard to the patient meeting TSGLI criterion for ADL loss (bathe and dress) for any payable...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01054
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to his traumatic injury, he is entitled to TSGLI and he has provided the supporting documents indicating his inability to perform at least two of the six ADLs. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends denial indicating that after reviewing the applicants original claim and appeal, he does not meet TSGLI criterion for ADL loss due...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01344
His medical provider documented that he was unable to perform 4 of the 6 ADLS for 60 days. The claim and medical records were reviewed and his request for loss of ADLs (bathe, dress, toilet) due to Other Traumatic Injury (OTI) from 10 Jul to 21 Aug 03 was approved and he was paid $25,000 on 5 Jun 13. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05480
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05480 ` COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Service Members Group Life Insurance Traumatic Injury Protection (TSGLI) claim be approved due to his inability to perform at least two of the six Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 60 consecutive days. While the Board notes the documentation submitted by the applicant in support of his contention that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5353 13
Ara PAE ee uu ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary Of the Navy SE (a) Title 10 U.B.G.. 1552 (1) DD Form 14° w/attachments (2) Advisory Opinion (A/O) from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) meme Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) Co¢rdinator, Wounded Warrior Regiment of 16 Apr 2014 (3) Chronologi¢al Record of Medical Care of 24 Aug 2009 and Radiology j.esults ico fof 25 Apr 2009 Statement rom of 27 Apr 2014 Statement ‘rom of 25...