RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00759
INDEX CODE: 137.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that he did not enroll in the Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP).
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF CASE:
In an application to the Board dated 9 Mar 06, applicant requested
corrective action that would allow him to terminate the SBP coverage for
his handicapped daughter claiming he was not aware of the negative impact
SBP payments would have on his daughter if she was to receive Medicaid
assistance.
On 12 Apr 06, AFPC/DPPRT reviewed the case and recommended approval. They
stated there is no evidence of an Air Force error in this case; however, in
the interest of justice, the member’s records should be corrected to show
he terminated SBP coverage under the provisions of Public Law (PL) 105-85
effective 17 May 98.
On 2 May 06, the Board agreed with the recommendation of the Air Force and
recommended the applicant’s records be corrected to show effective 17 May
98, he elected to terminate his Survivor Benefit Plan child only coverage
under the provisions of Public Law 105-85. The facts and circumstances
surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by
the Board, can be found at Exhibit A.
On 7 Sep 06, applicant received notification from DFAS that corrective
action was made to his record to reflect that he elected to terminate his
participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan effective 17 May 98, and that he
was due a refund in the amount of $1,152.57, less any applicable taxes
(Exhibit B).
On 27 Sep 06, applicant sent a letter to the AFBCMR asking how DFAS arrived
at their calculations. He was particularly addressing the fact that DFAS
only refunded money back for six years and that he paid into the program
for over 30 years because he was ill-advised by the Air Force Personal
Affairs Office (Exhibit C). On 12 Jan 07, applicant’s letter was forwarded
to DFAS for their action and response to the applicant’s questions. DFAS’s
response to the applicant can be found at Exhibit D.
On 13 Mar 07, applicant requested reconsideration by the Board. He states
his previous letter to the Board may have been misleading because he was
not just complaining about the tax, but also the small amount of money he
was reimbursed. He paid money into the Program because he was ill-advised
by an Air Force employee. He was told by this advisor that the SBP Program
was especially good for his handicapped daughter, while it turns out this
Program is especially bad for her. It disqualifies her for other programs
such as SSI, Medicaid, etc. (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRT was asked to provide an additional evaluation based on the
applicant’s new appeal. DPPRT recommends denial and stated, in part, SBP
child coverage is basically irrevocable and cannot be arbitrarily
terminated as long as there is an eligible beneficiary. While they
acknowledge the incongruity of one governmental benefit adversely affecting
others, there is currently no option in the laws controlling SBP to
terminate coverage for an incapacitated child except under the
disenrollment period authorization by Public Law 105-85. The Department of
Defense’s Joint SBP Board has discussed this issue; however, a resolution
has not yet been achieved. Since there has been no changes made to the SBP
law, their original recommendation to correct the member’s record is
unchanged.
The additional DPPRT evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the additional Air Force evaluation and states he has no
more documentation to send, and that mistakes have been made concerning his
daughter. In this case a mistake was made by an employee at the Personal
Affairs Office, at Randolph AFB, in advising him to enroll in the SBP for
his daughter. Unfortunately, the advice was not documented.
Applicant's complete response is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After careful review of the
applicant’s recent submission and the evidence of record, a majority of the
Board is of the opinion relief is warranted. The Board notes the applicant
appealed to the AFBCMR in March 2006 requesting that he be allowed to
terminate SBP coverage for his handicapped child. The Board approved his
request to terminate his child SBP coverage effective 17 May 1998, the date
PL 105-85 authorized a one-year window to disenroll from the SBP. We note
the Air Force OPR indicated this situation has been a long standing problem
with the incongruity of one governmental benefit adversely affecting
others, and that the Department of Defense’s Joint SBP Board has discussed
this issue, and that a resolution has not been achieved. Therefore, the
majority of the Board believes it is possible the applicant was not
properly counseled that enrollment in the SBP could possibly adversely
affect other benefits his handicapped daughter would be eligible for.
Therefore, the majority of the Board believes any doubt should be resolved
in favor of the applicant and that his records should be corrected as
indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan
(SBP) coverage during the open enrollment period (21 Sep 72 – 20 Mar 74,
authorized by Public Law 92-425.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00759
in Executive Session on 26 September 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records, as recommended.
Ms. Hassan voted to deny the application, but elected not to submit a
minority report. The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket
Number BC-2006-00759 was considered:
Exhibit A. AFBCMR Directive, dated 3 May 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, DFAS, dated 7 Sep 06, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Sep 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, DFAS, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Mar 07.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFPC/DPPRT, dated 24 Apr 07.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 May 07.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 May 07.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-00759
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to [APPLICANT], be corrected to show that he declined Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage during the open enrollment period (21 Sep 72 –
20 Mar 74) authorized by Public Law 92-425.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01798
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. However, the applicant will have an opportunity to discontinue participation in the SBP at any time during the one-year period authorized by PL 105-85, beginning on the second...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03820
On 11 March 1999, the applicant submitted a request to terminate his SBP coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85. PL 108-375 authorized an open enrollment period from 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006 to enroll in SBP, but the law stipulates that servicemembers who terminated coverage under the provisions of PL 105-85 can not renter the program. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02399
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force he elected child coverage under the SBP. If his daughter’s disability was diagnosed while she was otherwise eligible, the member could have elected coverage on her behalf during the initial open enrollment; however, there is no evidence such an election was submitted. We believe the applicant would have elected to provide coverage for his daughter...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04088
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her father has not had contact with his spouse for over 15 years and financially he can no longer afford SBP premiums. There is no record the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656-2 required to terminate his SBP coverage during the disenrollment period provided by PL 105-85. There is no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice in this case; therefore, DPPRT recommends the request be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02539
PL 92-425, which established the SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an 18- month enrollment period (21 Sep 72 - 20 Mar 74) for retired members to elect SBP coverage, but were not required to return an SBP election form in order to decline coverage. RSFPP participants could have terminated previous RSFPP coverage, or retained it in addition to a new SBP election. There were no provisions in the laws during these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify spouses of retired members...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03326
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03326 INDEX CODE: 137.01 COUNSEL: GAINES W. SMITH HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 APR 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Applicant was the spouse of the deceased former servicemember, who requests her late husband’s records be corrected to entitle her to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03507
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant retired on 1 Oct 99. DPPRT states the applicant was married and had dependent children prior to his 1 Oct 99 retirement; however, he failed to attend the mandatory SBP briefing and did not complete an SBP election prior to that date. DPPRT concludes if the Board’s decision is to approve the request the applicant’s records should be corrected to reflect he terminated SBP coverage effective 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02340
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement, he elected child only coverage for his disabled child. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting the requested relief in the interest of justice. In addition if the service member elected child coverage in conjunction with an election for spouse, or elects child only coverage, the SBP annuity may...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01425
DPPRT states that Public Law (PL) 99-145 requires spouses of married servicemembers to concur in writing, prior to the servicemember’s retirement, in SBP elections that provide less than full spouse coverage. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00130
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force OPR states a review of the applicant’s record indicates the member elected spouse only coverage based on full retired pay (immediate option) under the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) on 5 May 79, after becoming eligible to receive retired pay except for attaining age 60. The member had an opportunity to disenroll during the 98-99 period and ample resources to obtain information on correct...