RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03315
INDEX CODE: 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 May 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect his rank at the time of discharge
as sergeant versus corporal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The requirement to attend a class was to be demoted to corporal. He
attended the class and did not complete it. Therefore, he believes
that he should have been discharged as a sergeant.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his WD AGO Form
53-55, a certificate and two letters from the Army Review Boards
Agency.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s master personnel record (MPR) may have been lost or
destroyed. Based on the available documentation the following facts
are provided.
Applicant enlisted in the Army Air Corps on 17 September 1942 and
entered active duty the same day. He performed duties as a clerk
typist. His highest grade held was sergeant. His separation document
shows the following: He participated in Central Burma and India-Burma
battles and campaigns. He received the following decorations and
citations: American Service Medal, Asiatic-Pacific Service Medal and
World War II Victory Medal. He was credited with 2 years, 8 months
and 22 days of continental service and one year, seven months and six
days of foreign service.
On 4 January 1946, while serving in the grade of corporal, he was
honorably discharged for the Convenience of the Government
(Demobilization).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPWB recommends denial. They reviewed the limited records and
found no documentation concerning his reduction from sergeant to
corporal. An Enlisted Record and Report of Separation reflect his
grade at time of discharge as corporal and highest grade held as
sergeant. The record also contains a Final Payment Work Sheet
reflecting grade as corporal. Therefore, they have no basis to
recommend his grade be changed.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant provided a statement saying the furthest thing on his
mind when he was discharged on 1/4/46 was his rank; all he wanted was
to go home. He was asked at the time if he had anything wrong with
him but he said no because he did not want to delay his discharge any
further. At the time, every time he drank he got terrible stomach
pains. He lived with that until 1949 when he had his first bleeding
episode and was rushed to the hospital. He did not know anything
about the VA. In 1954, he was taken to a VA hospital and before he
was discharged, he was advised that he was entitled to a service-
connected disability which he has received ever since. It has only
been in the last two years that he thought about his old rank of
sergeant. He thought it would be nice on his headstone. Sergeant
would look better than corporal. He is not looking for anything else.
He gave up the sergeant rank because that was the rank in effect to
go into the ASTP Program which was cancelled about three months after
he dropped out.
On 7/6/06, he and his wife will have been married for 60 years. They
had 10 children. One son died in September of 2005.
Applicant's response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. Based on the limited records and
the passage of time, it is not possible at this point to determine the
exact circumstances regarding his reduction from sergeant to corporal.
We note his highest grade held was sergeant. Therefore, in an effort
to offset any possibility of an injustice to the applicant, it is our
opinion that the applicant’s records should be corrected to the extent
recommended below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 4 January 1946, he
was discharged in the grade of sergeant.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 9 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Panel Chair
Mr. August Doddato, Member
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 21 Nov 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Dec 05.
CATHLYNN B. SPARKS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-03315
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 4 January
1946, he was discharged in the grade of sergeant.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03426
DPPPWB states the applicant waited more than 59 years after discharge to petition the Board. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). Unfortunately, there was no documentation in his records to indicate when he was promoted to staff sergeant.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02271
Applicant states that due to his records being lost, he entered the Reserve in the grade of corporal and was told that his grade would be changed to sergeant. After reviewing the available documentation and noting applicant’s contentions, the majority of the Board believes that applicant’s grade at time of discharge from the Reserve should be changed to sergeant. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-02271 INDEX CODE: 131.00 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2000-02569
On 22 Mar 90, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAF/PC) determined that the applicant served satisfactorily in the grade of technical sergeant and that he would be advanced to that grade on the Retired List upon reaching 30 years of total service (17 Nov 00). The Board notes that the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council reviewed the applicant's case and determined that he did serve satisfactorily in the grade of technical sergeant and that he has been advanced to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02628
Applicant chose not to appeal the commander’s determination, which prevented a timely look by another commander at the issues applicant now raises again, over three years later. There was sufficient evidence for the commander to determine that the applicant had committed the alleged offenses. If the Board elects to set aside the Article 15, the applicant’s effective date and date of rank would be 1 Apr 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00329
The reasons for the commander’s action were: a. On 1 Aug 01, the squadron commander recommended to the wing commander the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 23 Aug 02 the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied an appeal from the applicant to upgrade his discharge to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02650
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02650 INDEX NUMBER: 126.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of senior airman (E-4) lost as a result of an Article 15 action be restored with a date of rank (DOR) of 20 Jan 02. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01990
DPPPR states to be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Applicant's Response.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03761
The applicant does not offer evidence in support of the claim as required by AFI 36-2603, Air Force for Correction of Military Records, and AFP 36-2607, Applicant's Guide to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). The applicant did not participate in VEAP, therefore, does not qualify under the law to participate in VEAP or convert to the MGIB under the current statues. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2004-02142
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was initially enlisted on 8 May 2003 in the higher grade of A1C as she enlisted in a critical Air Force Specialty (AFS). She was enlisted in the next lower grade and later found another airman who had enlisted under the same circumstances but at the higher grade. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02406
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02406 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 29 January 2000 through 28 January 2001 be declared void and replaced with a reaccomplished report. ...