Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-01819A
Original file (BC-2002-01819A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-01819A
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant's request for reconsideration,  he  requests  his  general
(under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 30 June 1999, as
an airman first class (A1C) for a period of four years.

The applicant's request to be reinstated to active duty and be awarded back
pay was considered and denied by the Board on  19 November  2002.   For  an
accounting of the  facts  and  circumstances  surrounding  the  applicant's
request to receive back pay and  reinstatement  to  active  duty,  and  the
rationale of  the  earlier  decision  by  the  Board,  see  the  Record  of
Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit J.

The applicant submitted  an  undated  letter  with  attachments  requesting
reconsideration of his request that his general discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable (Exhibit K).

Pursuant to the Board’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,
Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report  which  is  attached  at
Exhibit C.  The report was not forwarded to the applicant because the  only
entry was the assault charge while on active duty (Exhibit L).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After careful consideration of the applicant’s reconsideration request  and
the documentation submitted in support of his appeal, we are not  persuaded
that reversal of our  previous  decision  is  warranted.   The  applicant’s
contentions are duly noted, however,
we find no impropriety in the characterization  of  applicant’s  discharge.
It appears that responsible  officials  applied  appropriate  standards  in
effecting the separation, and we  do  not  find  persuasive  evidence  that
pertinent regulations were violated or that the applicant was not  afforded
all the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge.   Therefore,  we
conclude the discharge was appropriate under the existing circumstances and
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2002-
01819A in Executive Session on 23 March 2006, under the  provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
                 Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit J. Record of Proceedings, dated 12 Dec 04, w/atchs.
      Exhibit K. Applicant’s Reconsideration Request, undated,
            w/atchs.
      Exhibit L. FBI Report.




                                        MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
                                        Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2000-00961-2

    Original file (BC-2000-00961-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A summary of the evidence considered and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board is set forth in the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 10 January 2002, in response to a congressional inquiry, in behalf of the applicant, the AFBCMR denied the applicant’s request for reconsideration of her application (Refer to Exhibit G). To support this assertion, the applicant provided a personal statement, a statement from a Forensic Investigator who opines that the signature on the letter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01169-2

    Original file (BC-2005-01169-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 18 May 06, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s above stated requests (Exhibit J). Prior to processing of the reconsideration, the applicant submitted an undated DD Form 149 with an attachment, dated 8 Oct 06, requesting reconsideration of his case and providing additional evidence (Exhibit L). Therefore, the request for a hearing is again not favorably...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03622

    Original file (BC-2002-03622.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 115.03, 128.04 AFBCMR BC-2002-03622 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-01124C

    Original file (BC-1998-01124C.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The decision noted the treatment for anxiety in the service and the 22 May 04 opinion of a DVA examination that concluded the applicant suffered from schizophrenia either during his military service or, more likely, in the year following military service in 1976. In a DD Form 149 dated 2 Sep 04, the applicant requested reconsideration, and submitted his 100% DVA rating for service- connected schizophrenia, 24 years after his discharge from the Air Force. The Consultant provided additional...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03678-2

    Original file (BC-2001-03678-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. The applicant’s medical evaluation was completed at Wilford Hall Medical Center on 17 October 2002 and the results were forwarded to the Board for review (refer to Exhibit I). The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit J. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 16 December 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1985-03480B

    Original file (BC-1985-03480B.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1985-03480 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 23 February 1985, the applicant submitted an application requesting that his undesirable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2001-01784-3

    Original file (BC-2001-01784-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart medal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03701

    Original file (BC-2007-03701.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 January 1989, he was notified by his commander that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative Separation of Airman, para 5-26d, Irresponsibility in the management of personal finances. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 10 February 2008.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02819

    Original file (BC-2007-02819.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02819 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 13 Feb 08.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03210

    Original file (BC-2007-03210.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03210 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation provided an Investigative Report which is attached at...