RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02197
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: VFW
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 January 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be compensated for 56 days of leave lost and be paid for any travel
entitlements resulting from the change of his discharge to a retirement.
By amendment at Exhibit F, applicant requests he be given a retirement flag
and a certificate of retirement from his unit.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While his investigation was pending, he could not take leave. He was
allowed to take a few coordinated leave days but this situation left him
with earned leave. When he was discharged he was advised that his
separation orders only covered mileage to his home of record. He incurred
some traveling costs when discharged. He is requesting a flat per diem
family rate for each travel day to his home of record.
In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement,
a copy of his Leave and Earnings Statement for the period 1-28 February
2002, a copy of his DD Form 214 and documents associated with his discharge
and retirement. His submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 8 March 2002, while serving in the grade of master sergeant, the
applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions)
discharge. He had served 20 years, 5 months and 11 days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Board’s recommendation, on 28 August 2003, the applicant’s
record was corrected to show he was not discharged on 8 March 2002 but
rather, he was relieved from active duty and, effective 1 March 2002, he
was retired for length of service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
AFPC/DPF recommends partial relief. DPF states the applicant’s pay account
reflects he lost 44 days of leave when he was discharged. He carried
forward 43.5 days of leave at the end of FY01. He earned 13.5 days of
leave in FY02 and used 13 days of leave during FY02 for a remaining balance
at discharge of 44 days of leave. The AFPC/DPF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
USAF/DPPC states that the applicant’s final travel voucher, dated 1 May
2002, reflects he was paid a monetary allowance in lieu of transportation
(MALT) allowance to his home of record, Lima, OH. In addition to his MALT
allowance, he was also paid per diem for seven travel days, which is the
maximum allowed in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulation. On
a separate issue, DPPC notes that the applicant was overpaid for eight days
of active duty from 1-8 March 2002. This debt resulted from his status
change from separation to retirement which no longer entitles him to pay
from 1-8 March 2002. Alternatively, DPPC states if the Board wishes to
grant relief, they recommend his record be changed to reflect a date of
retirement of 1 April 2002 and place the applicant in a terminal leave
status from 1-31 March 2002, thus enabling him to receive pay and
allowances for thirty days while in a terminal leave status. The USAF/DPPC
evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Applicant responds by stating he concurs with the allowance he received in
lieu of a transportation allowance. However, he has paid back the eight
days of active duty from 1-8 March 2002 and would like to receive pay and
allowances for thirty days while in a terminal leave status as suggested by
USAF/DPPC. Applicant’s letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After reviewing the applicant’s
submission and the evidence of record, we are persuaded that some relief is
warranted. In this respect, we are in agreement with the opinions of the
respective Air Force offices that the evidence supports award of 44 days of
leave lost at the time of his discharge. We have noted that USAF/DPPC has
recommended that the applicant’s retirement be adjusted and he be placed in
a terminal leave status; however, we believe it should be noted that
terminal leave is not an automatic entitlement and we have no way of
knowing whether or not his commander would have approved of this
entitlement during this period. More importantly, in view of the issues
reviewed in connection with the Board’s decision to afford the applicant
retirement for length of service in lieu of a discharge for cause, we are
not inclined to afford the applicant the extraordinary windfall of an
additional month of service credit which, in turn, would increase his
lifetime entitlement to the computation of his retired pay. Rather, in
view of the totality of the circumstances of this case, we believe that the
applicant will be afforded proper and fitting relief by compensating him
for the 44 days leave he lost. The Board notes, however, that the
applicant has already sold the maximum 60 days of leave allowed by law,
necessitating that we compensate him by other means. Therefore, we
recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. In
regard to his request that he be paid for any travel entitlements resulting
from the change of his discharge to a retirement, we note the applicant is
in agreement with the Air Force assessment that he was paid accordingly via
a monetary allowance in lieu of a transportation allowance; therefore no
Board action is required.
4. The Board notes the applicant’s request that he be given a retirement
flag and a certificate of retirement from his unit; we advise the applicant
that this matter is not within the purview of this Board and recommend he
pursue this matter with his former unit.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was in a temporary duty status
for a sufficient period of time beginning 28 September 2001 and was paid
total per diem in an amount equivalent to forty-four (44) days of pay and
allowance.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 16 November 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated, 4 Jun 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPF, dated 16 Aug 04.
Exhibit C. Letter, USAF/DPPC, dated 2 Sep 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Sep 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Sep 04, w/atchs.
MARILYN M. THOMAS
Vice Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02197
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was in a
temporary duty status for a sufficient period of time beginning 28
September 2001 and was paid total per diem in an amount equivalent to
forty-four (44) days of pay and allowance.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
At the time, she was in a Safe Haven status, as opposed to Designated Place status, and should not have been allowed to receive a household goods shipment. Since she had already received 2 AFBCMR 97-02495 household goods on the date she entered Designated Place status on 18 Oct 96, all Safe Haven/Designated Place entitlements stopped. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant's records be corrected to reflect that he was 3 AFBCMR 97-02495 entitled to Safe Haven benefits until 11 Dec 96...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02153
He is not entitled to full reimbursement of his airline tickets purchased for travel from Los Angeles to Baltimore, because it exceeds the MALT PLUS between Atlanta and Baltimore. He was briefed that he could not be issued government travel tickets for his leave travel. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. DPRCC states that the applicant was reimbursed for dependent travel based on cost comparison for mixed modes of travel. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, after thorough review of the evidence provided we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
Therefore, based on his most recent information, the applicant signed a housing lease on 1 April 1997 at the $2500 rate believing this was the correct rate. After he signed the lease, the applicant was informed there was a change to the JFTR and his OHA rate would be $2300. LEROY k5xwd-9 T. BASEMAN Panel Chair 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AF'BCMR 97-01 692 AUG 1 4 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02804
He earned 30 days of leave during FY04 and used 31 days of leave. He earned 10 days of leave between 1 Oct 04 and 31 Jan 05 and used eight days of leave. In a 23 Dec 04 letter, the applicant once again stated he did not understand he was applying for a 1 Feb 05 retirement date.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01336
R0-00-021, dated 8 November 1999, from 15 November 1999 through 14 December 1999 (30 days); per amendment RO-00-021A, dated 9 December 1999, from 15 December 1999 through 7 April 2000 (114 days); per S.O. Nevertheless, JAA believes the equities of this case suggest the Board either correct the records to show completion of 20 years for retirement or require him to complete the time specified by ARPC to qualify for Reserve retirement. He requests his LOR be removed from his records, his...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02472
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends approval to restore 35 days of lost leave. The complete DPF evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAOO recommends denial to the applicant’s request to correct his separation and retirement dates to reflect 28 February 2005 and 1 March 2005, respectively. The Board notes the Force Shaping Program in force at that time stated phase II officers serving on active duty in the Limited EAD...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00055 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed $214.00 for cost of personally procuring a commercial airline ticket for official travel expenses for his temporary duty (TDY) to Brooks AFB, TX. ...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2011-247
The applicant alleged that although the command in Elizabeth City authorized his travel, shipment of his personal vehicles, and travel time, the com- mand in Hawaii unjustly and erroneously revoked the authorizations, costing him money and days of leave, all because one of his vehicles was shipped from Virginia to Hawaii. Although the applicant alleged that he filed a BCMR application about this matter 1988, the Board has no record of receiving that application. The docu- ments submitted...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02995 NOV 0 5 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, t h e decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertin Force relating to show that on 4 Au reimbursement...