RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00511
INDEX CODE: 112.03, 131.09
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her enlistment grade be changed from E-1 (Airman Basic) to E-3 (Airman
First Class) and that she receive a bonus for enlisting in the 3C1X1
Air Force Specialty (AFS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her recruiter provided her erroneous information when she enlisted.
She enlisted as a Radio Communication Systems Helper for a six-year
term. As such, she contends she was eligible for and should have
received an enlistment bonus for enlisting in a critical career field.
She states that because she enlisted for a six-year term on her
initial enlistment, she was qualified to enter the Air National Guard
(ANG) as an E-3.
In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided copies of her DD
Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, her enlistment order and a
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant, a member of the Virgin Islands Air National Guard
(VIANG), enlisted on 18 September 1998, for a period of six years, as
a Radio Communications Systems Helper. She is currently serving in
the VIANG as a traditional guardsman in the grade of staff sergeant (E-
5).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ANG/DPPI recommends denial. DPPI notes the ANG Enlisted Cash Bonus
Program provides enlistment and reenlistment bonuses to traditional
guardsmen enlisting for six years in specialties deemed critical.
Each state and territory publishes an annual incentive-eligible list
of critical AFSC’s. She, the VIANG, nor the NGB can provide the
incentive-eligible list from September 1998 that would show whether or
not she was eligible for any incentives. DPPI notes that non-prior
service members enlisting into a critical AFS for a period of six
years are authorized the enlistment grade of E-3. In fact, her DD
Form 4 does indeed show she enlisted for a period of six years
beginning in the pay grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3). However,
an individual enlisting in the senior year of high school will be
enlisted in the grade of E-1 until such time as they graduate and
present required documents whereupon they are immediately promoted to
the grade of E-3. Numerous attempts were made to determine her
education level at the time of her enlistment and no documentation was
provided to verify her eligibility. Therefore, her request to change
her enlistment grade from E-1 to E-3 is not substantiated and she is
therefore not considered eligible for E-3 at enlistment.
ANG/DPPI’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
29 October 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Applicant contends that she
was provided erroneous information when she enlisted in the VIANG.
However, she has not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate her
allegation of miscounseling with respect to the bonus opportunity or
that she should have been enlisted in the grade of Airman First Class
(E-3). After reviewing the evidence of record, we note that the ANG
cannot determine whether applicant's AFSC was listed as incentive-
eligible at the time of applicant's enlistment. Based upon the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and
without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant's
grade at the time of her enlistment was correct. Should the applicant
provide documentary evidence showing that her AFSC was entitled to a
bonus at the time of her enlistment, we would be willing to reconsider
her appeal. In the absence of such evidence, favorable action on her
application is not recommended.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-00511 in Executive Session on 4 January 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jan 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ANG/DPPI, dated 2 Nov 04, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 04.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00507
After reviewing the evidence of record, we note that the ANG cannot determine whether applicant's AFSC was listed as incentive- eligible at the time of applicant's enlistment. Should the applicant provide documentary evidence showing that her AFSC was entitled to a bonus at the time of her enlistment, we would be willing to reconsider her appeal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00509
After reviewing the evidence of record, we note that the ANG cannot determine whether applicant's AFSC was listed as incentive- eligible at the time of applicant's enlistment. Should the applicant provide documentary evidence showing that her AFSC was entitled to a bonus at the time of her enlistment, we would be willing to reconsider her appeal. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00510 INDEX CODE: 112.03, 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her enlistment grade be changed from E-1 (Airman Basic) to E-3 (Airman First Class); that she receive a bonus for enlisting in the 3C1X1 Air Force Specialty (AFS); and, that her promotion to E-4 be adjusted. After reviewing...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03055
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03055 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded cash enlistment and reenlistment bonuses for both periods of her service in the Air National Guard (ANG): 1997 for three years and 2003 for six years. The criteria for receipt of enlistment/reenlistment bonuses in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02472
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02472 INDEX CODE: 128.06 COUNSEL: WALTER L. BOYAKI HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The bonus/loan agreements signed at the time of his appointment in the New York Air National Guard (NY ANG) on 11 March 2001 be honored; or in the alternative, he be allowed to be honorably discharged from the NY ANG. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2004-02142
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was initially enlisted on 8 May 2003 in the higher grade of A1C as she enlisted in a critical Air Force Specialty (AFS). She was enlisted in the next lower grade and later found another airman who had enlisted under the same circumstances but at the higher grade. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04285
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant, an Active/Guard Reserve (AGR) member of the Arizona ANG (AZ ANG), was laterally transferred into a full-time GS-09 civilian position attached to a military position at the grade of SMSgt. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00317
DPPI’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterates his contention that he was not awarded service credit for his full-time experience on completion of his training. He addresses the DPPI contention that AFI 36-2005, Table 2.1, Note 8, states that applicants with less than 14 years service credit will be appointed in the grade of captain. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03006
He did not appear to have fully grasped the material and had a difficult time during the PC. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. The applicant was unable to progress in technical training, first in the computer programming career field and then when he was reclassified in the telephone systems AFSC.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an enlistment bonus for her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC)/7-skill level and she be awarded the rank of airman first class. The applicant initialed and signed the DD Form 1966 continuation sheet that states both Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills and Enlisting with Stripes for: sections were...