Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01514
Original file (BC-2004-01514.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01514
            INDEX CODE:  135.02

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded a Reserve retirement at age 60 instead of severance  pay
due to his having 18 years of service.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He entered the Air National Guard (ANG) in 1985 and has  since  served
his country by fighting  in  two  wars:  Desert  Storm  and  Operation
Enduring Freedom.  He was granted a disability and offered only one of
two possible options  as  a  result.   He  was  offered  and  accepted
discharge with severance pay but was not aware  at  the  time  of  his
right to a Reserve retirement at age 60 instead of severance pay.   He
believes his military service has been dishonored and that he has been
hoodwinked.  He would like to accept a Reserve retirement  instead  of
discharge with severance pay and would  like  his  record  to  reflect
such.

In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his  DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from  Active  Duty,  his
National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separations and  Record
of Service, his discharge  order,  a  memo  from  the  South  Carolina
Adjutant  General’s  office  in  response  to  a  request   from   his
representative, a memo of explanation from the ANG HQ, and a  copy  of
Air Force Form 1180, Medical Evaluation Board Findings and Recommended
Disposition.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant, a former member of  the  South  Carolina  ANG  (SCANG),
served on active duty from 25 February 2002 to  24  February  2003  in
support of Operation Enduring Freedom/Iraqi Freedom.  He was, at  some
point, injured and subsequently met an  Informal  Physical  Evaluation
Board (IPEB).  The IPEB recommended the applicant be  discharged  with
disability severance pay in the grade  of  Staff  Sergeant  with  5.61
years of active service.  The applicant agreed with this finding as he
so indicated on the AF Form 1180.  He was discharged  with  disability
severance effective 20 January 2004.  He was discharged in  the  grade
of Staff Sergeant and had served 18 years, 1 month,  and  25  days  of
combined active and Reserve service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ANG/DPPI recommends denial.  DPPI states the applicant  was  processed
properly under the Disability Evaluation System (DES) by  the  Regular
Air Force and they can find no evidence of error or injustice  in  his
case.  The applicant was offered discharge with severance pay and  not
the option to transfer to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section  to
await retired  pay  at  age  60,  because  he  had  not  completed  20
satisfactory years of service.  At  the  time  of  his  discharge,  he
accepted the severance pay as evidenced by his  signature  on  the  AF
Form 1180.  DPPI states further that applicant  was  not  eligible  to
transfer to ISLRS as his last six years were not qualifying years  nor
did he complete 20 years of satisfactory service.  DPPI  can  find  no
error or injustice in this case.

DPPI’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
28 January 2005 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error  or  injustice.   Applicant  is  not  entitled  to   a   Reserve
retirement, as his last six years of service were not qualifying years
spent in a Reserve component.  Therefore, in the absence  of  evidence
to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-01514 in Executive Session on 26 April 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
      Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 May 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ANG/DPPI, dated 24 Jan 05.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jan 05.




                                   B.J. WHITE-OLSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00908

    Original file (BC-2004-00908.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 February 2000, he met a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) wherein he was found disqualified for worldwide duty for a condition that existed prior to service (EPTS) and recommended for medical discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00254

    Original file (BC-2005-00254.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00254 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00246

    Original file (BC-2005-00246.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00246 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00250

    Original file (BC-2005-00250.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00250 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00251

    Original file (BC-2005-00251.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00251 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00253

    Original file (BC-2005-00253.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00253 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00252

    Original file (BC-2005-00252.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00252 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00207

    Original file (BC-2005-00207.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00207 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00244

    Original file (BC-2005-00244.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00244 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00245

    Original file (BC-2005-00245.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00245 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...