Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00921
Original file (BC-2004-00921.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00921
            INDEX NUMBER: 107.00

      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his injury during his  tour  in  Vietnam
and he be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).

_________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In 1972, Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam, was attacked with more than 100  rounds
of incoming rockets and  mortar  fire.   During  the  attack,  his  barracks
received a direct hit and he sustained an injury to  his  chin  from  flying
shrapnel.  He was treated at the dispensary; however, due to  the  confusion
and since the dispensary was understaffed and overrun, his  injury  was  not
documented.  As a result, he is unable to produce medical  support  for  his
claim for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits two statements from  individuals
who were at Bien Hoa AB during the  referenced  attack.   One  statement  is
from an individual attesting to the applicant’s injury as  a  direct  result
of enemy action.   The  other  statement  attests  to  the  injury  and  the
treatment he received.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant was permanently retired for disability  effective  26 March  1986,
with a disability rating of 30%.  He completed 23 years, 11 months,  and  15
days of active federal military service.





The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result  of  enemy  actions
(i.e., gunshot  or  shrapnel  wounds,  hand-to-hand  combat  wounds,  forced
aircraft bail out injuries, etc.).  In addition, it is necessary  the  wound
required or received treatment by medical personnel.  Indirect  injuries  do
not meet the criteria for award of the PH.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPRA recommends the application be denied and states, in  part,  that
without the basic information and documentation proving the injury  incurred
as a  direct  result  of  enemy  action,  they  are  unable  to  verify  his
eligibility for award of the PH.

The AFPC/DPPPRA evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 18 June 2004 for review and response within  30  days.   However,  as  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.   In  this  respect,  we  note  the  PH  is
awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions  and  it  is
necessary the wound required or received  treatment  by  medical  personnel.
The applicant contends he sustained  an  injury  to  his  chin  from  flying
shrapnel in 1972, at Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam, when his barracks  received
a direct hit during an enemy rocket and mortar attack.  He further  contends
that although his wound received treatment at the  dispensary,  due  to  the
confusion and since the dispensary was  understaffed,  his  injury  was  not
documented.  The statements provided by applicant are noted; however,  these
individuals do not state they witnessed applicant being wounded as a  direct
result of enemy action.  The personal sacrifice applicant  endured  for  his
country is noted and our decision in no way diminishes the  high  regard  we
have for his service; however, insufficient documentary  evidence  has  been
presented to warrant awarding him  the  Purple  Heart.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence that he was injured as a direct result of enemy  action,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2004-00921
in Executive Session on 1 September 2004, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                       Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
                       Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPRA, undated.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jun 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01918

    Original file (BC-2005-01918.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical records pertaining to the applicant’s DVA claim indicate he reported he had sustained a posterior left shoulder injury when he jumped out a cockpit of a grounded fighter during a rocket attack when stationed at Bien Hoa AB in Jun 68. A member must provide documentation to support the injury was a direct result of enemy action and required or received medical treatment by medical personnel. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01465

    Original file (BC-2005-01465.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH on 1 November 2005. Applicant’s personal statement is noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include his service medical records, we find no corroborative evidence to establish that he was treated for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action during a rocket attack on 28 February 1968. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01342

    Original file (BC-2005-01342.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01342 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANATORY COMPLETION DATE: 23 OCTOBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries received at Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01918A

    Original file (BC-2005-01918A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to a 14 Jun 68 medical entry by the dispensary at Bien Hoa AB, Republic of Vietnam (RVN), his back left shoulder area was sutured for a laceration. In addition, the fact that the applicant is being compensated by the DVA at 10% for the injury does not inherently establish it was directly caused by the enemy, only that it was service connected. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03374

    Original file (BC-2012-03374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Each request is considered based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Furthermore, a review of his medical record reveals the applicant received medical treatment in 1970 for injuries he sustained due to a rocket attack in Bien Hoa AB, Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04001

    Original file (BC-2011-04001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s record states he received medical treatment in Jun 70 for a back injury he experienced at Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam, while working on a construction project. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we find no evidence which would lead us to believe the applicant’s injuries were a direct result of enemy action as required for award of the PH. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03684

    Original file (BC-1997-03684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered active duty on 15 Aug 66. A) provided a statement to the DVA; however, he does not mention any enemy-action injury to the applicant. On 11 Mar 97, his case was forwarded to the PH Review Board where it was determined that his medical documentation did not support his claim of injury.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9703684

    Original file (9703684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered active duty on 15 Aug 66. A) provided a statement to the DVA; however, he does not mention any enemy-action injury to the applicant. On 11 Mar 97, his case was forwarded to the PH Review Board where it was determined that his medical documentation did not support his claim of injury.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02379

    Original file (BC 2013 02379.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant has presented recent medical documentation indicating a shrapnel injury to his knee, he has presented no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01559

    Original file (BC-2012-01559.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received a wound to his right great toe during a rocket and mortar attack in Vietnam. A Chronological Record of Medical Care, provided by the applicant, indicates an entry, dated 28 January 1970, where the applicant sustained a “bunker injury” by stubbing his right great toe, folding the toenail back. In addition, the medical documentation provided does not give any indication the injury was related...