Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03777
Original file (BC-2003-03777.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03777
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His narrative reason for discharge be changed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He desires to enlist in the Navy.  He was discharged from the Air Force  for
drug abuse.  He states that he is not a drug abuser and  prior  to  entering
the Air Force he passed all drug screening  tests.   He  indicates  that  he
smoked marijuana at a party prior to entry.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 January 2002 in the  grade
of airman basic for a period of four years.

The applicant was notified on 20 February 2002 of his commander's intent  to
initiate discharge action against him for Fraudulent Entry.

The commander indicated the reason for his  proposed  action  was  that  the
applicant intentionally  concealed  prior  service  drug  usage,  which,  if
revealed,  could   have   resulted   in   rejection   of   his   enlistment.
Specifically, on 15 October 2001, the applicant executed  an  AF  Form  2030
(USAF  Drug  Certificate)  and  indicated  that  he  had   never   used   or
experimented with marijuana and never used or possessed any illegal drug  or
narcotic.  Then, on 22 January 2002, he certified that he had not  used  any
drug, including marijuana since he originally completed  the  form.   On  24
January 2002, he submitted a urine sample to be tested for the  presence  of
drugs in  accordance  with  (IAW)  AFI  44-120.   On  5 February  2002,  his
specimen was determined to be positive for the drug marijuana.  Had the  Air
Force known of his pre-service drug involvement it would have  rendered  him
ineligible to enlist.

The commander advised the applicant of his right to  consult  legal  counsel
and submit statements in his own behalf; or waive  the  above  rights  after
consulting with counsel.

After consulting with counsel, the applicant  waived  his  right  to  submit
statements in his own behalf.

On 21 February 2002, the Assistant  Staff  Judge  Advocate  recommended  the
applicant be separated from the service with an entry-level separation.

On 22 February 2002, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s entry-
level separation.

On 27 February  2002,  the  applicant  was  separated  with  an  entry-level
separation in the grade of airman basic, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
3208 (Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service/Drug Abuse).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS  recommended  denial.   They  indicated  that  based   upon   the
documentation in the master personnel records, the discharge was  consistent
with  the  procedural  and  substantive  requirements   of   the   discharge
regulation.  Additionally, the discharge was within the  discretion  of  the
discharge authority.  The applicant did  not  submit  any  new  evidence  or
identify any errors or injustices that occurred in  the  discharge  process.
Additionally, applicant did not provide any facts  warranting  a  change  in
his discharge.

The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 19 December 2003, a copy of the Air Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As of this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.





3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an  error  or  injustice.   After  a  thorough  review  of  the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission, the discharge appears  to  be
in compliance with the governing AFI and we find  no  evidence  to  indicate
that his separation from the Air Force was inappropriate.   The  applicant’s
narrative  reason  and  resulting   separation   program   designator   code
accurately reflects the reason for his separation and we do not  believe  he
has suffered from an injustice.  In view of the above,  we  agree  with  the
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and  adopt  their  rationale  as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of
an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief
sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice;  that  the  application  was  denied
without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the  application  will  only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
03777 in Executive Session on 29 January 2004, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                  Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Panel Chair
                  Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
                  Ms. Deborah A. Erickson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 November 2003.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 3 December 2003,
               w/atchs.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 December 2003.




                                CAROLYN J. WATKINS-TAYLOR
                                Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03202

    Original file (BC-2003-03202.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03202 INDEX CODE: A67.70 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 9 Sep 88, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Misconduct – Drug Abuse) and furnished a general discharge. As of this date, no response has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02818

    Original file (BC-2003-02818.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated that he was not aware that a warrant had been issued for his arrest, because if he had known about the warrant he would have had it resolved before entering the Air Force. In view of the foregoing, the Board recommends the applicant’s code be changed to “3K.” _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0203188

    Original file (0203188.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to his discharge are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS reviewed the application and recommends denial. DPPRS states that the applicant provided no facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. Therefore, based on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04013

    Original file (BC-2002-04013.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the uncharacterized entry-level separation received by the former member should be changed to an honorable discharge. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry- level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. However, after a thorough review of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03570

    Original file (BC-2002-03570.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03570 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reason for his discharge be changed to honorable. On 20 September 2002, while enrolled in technical training, applicant was notified by his commander that in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman (personality disorder),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03630

    Original file (BC-2003-03630.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03630 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRSP states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03189

    Original file (BC-2003-03189.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 November 1952 for a period of four (4) years in the grade of airman third class. Applicant was discharged on 13 November 1953, in the grade of airman basic with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, under the provisions of AFR 39-21 (Fraudulent Entry Into the Air Force). However, today a fraudulent entry would receive an honorable discharge and considering the discharge occurred 50 years ago and the type of offense leading...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03038

    Original file (BC-2003-03038.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03038 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. When the applicant was discharged he received an RE code of “2P” which at that time indicated the applicant was a marginal performer. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01212

    Original file (BC-2003-01212.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01212 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 11 Jan 01, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable and to change his reason for discharge. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03336

    Original file (BC-2002-03336.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 March 2000, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 02, w/atchs....