RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03037
INDEX CODE:
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC), discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was too ill to attend meetings (Unit Training Assembly’s/UTA’s),
and that he notified his superiors that he was ill. Therefore he was
unjustifiably put out of the Reserves for lack of participation.
In support of his appeal, applicant has provided a personal statement,
copies of medical and medical insurance documentation, a National
Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of
Service, and a DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty.
His complete submission, including attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the --- Air National Guard (--
ANG) on 12 November 1979. He had over nine years prior service in the
Navy, Navy Reserve and ANG. He had attained the grade of Airman First
Class (A1C/E-3) and entered the ANG at that grade.
Applicant did not attend UTA’s or required Annual Training for his
entire enlistment period in the ANG. He was demoted to Airman Basic
(AB) effective and with a date of rank of 30 December 1980 due to non-
participation.
On 16 September 1981, applicant’s commander initiated discharge action
against him under the auspices of AFI 36-3209, Unsatisfactory
Participation. As a result, on 23 May 1982, a review panel made up of
members from the HQ --- National Guard reviewed the applicant’s case
and recommended he be separated with a tentative characterization of
service, under other than honorable conditions, and he be
involuntarily transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). A
subsequent legal review of the recommendation found it legally
sufficient. Applicant was separated for non-participation on 3 June
1982 with an UOTHC discharge. He was discharged as an AB and
involuntarily transferred to the IRR.
Examiner’s Note: Applicant withdrew his case from consideration on 20
May 2003, to gather additional supporting documentation. On 16
October 2003, his case was reopened at his request.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ANG/DPPI recommends denial. DPPI notes in accordance with AFI 36-
3209, members may be discharged when the member has accumulated nine
or more unexcused absences within a 12-month period. The applicant
had accrued 120 unexcused UTA absences and two unexcused Annual
Training absences, 2-16 August 1980 and 8-22 August 1981. DPPI feels
that the discharge was conducted in accordance with prescribed
directives.
DPPI’s evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant has provided additional evidence in the form of a letter
from his psychiatrist that concludes the applicant suffered from
Dysthymic Disorder and Major Depression with Psychotic Features. His
psychiatrist claims the applicant had been under psychiatric care
since 1981. He also states the applicant has slowly made progress,
completed an undergraduate degree program, and is currently not under
active treatment. The applicant states his illness’s’ effected his
judgment and rationale in his daily functioning and, coupled with
other problems, was the source of what eventually lead to his UOTHC
discharge. Since he served “honorably” prior to this period and in
light of his health problems at the time, he respectfully requests his
discharge be upgraded.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. While he has provided a statement from his
attending physician from 18 November 1987 through 6 January 1996
indicating that he may have suffered from "Dysthmic Disorder" and
"Major Depression" as early as 1981, he has not provided any
documentation from either a civilian or military doctor to explain the
reasons for his accumulated 120 UTA absences and his unexcused absence
from two required Annual Training events before 1981, the basis for
his discharge. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2002-03037 in Executive Session on 29 October 2003, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Panel Chair
Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Sep 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ANG/DPPI , dated 6 Mar 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 1 Oct 03, w/atch.
MARILYN THOMAS
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01031
He was provided a general (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge from the -- ANG effective 15 February 2002. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated below. Michael K. Gallogly Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-01031 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00326
His character of service was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) and his reenlistment eligibility was recorded as “Ineligible.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPPI recommends denial. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting a change in his discharge and reenlisment eligibility. Vaughn E. Schlunz Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03004
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03004 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under other than honorable conditions, discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was demoted to A1C with an effective and date of rank of 25 October 1994. DPFP notes also that based on the discharge record...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01426
The commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a general, (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and while we sympathize with his situation at the time and appreciate his efforts to care for his family, there was simply no evidence presented that justified granting the requested relief; subsequently, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01288
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was discharged from the TN ANG for unsatisfactory participation on 31 May 1997 after serving seven years, nine months, and six days of combined Reserve component and Regular Air Force service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and while we sympathize with the applicant’s civilian employment predicament at the time, there is simply no...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02977
Applicant was warned of an impending demotion in grade from SRA to Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) as a result of his non-participation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02977
Applicant was warned of an impending demotion in grade from SRA to Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) as a result of his non-participation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01011
She accepted and was honorably discharged from active duty and enlisted in the Rhode Island Air National Guard. As a full time deputy, she placed her law enforcement career as a priority over her weekend drill duties in the Guard. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00926
He was recommended for discharge for non-participation. In accordance with Air National Guard Instruction (ANGI) 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, “…members may be discharged when the member has accumulated nine or more unexcused absences from UTA within a 12-month period.” The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with prescribed directives and the State’s Staff Judge Advocate found the discharge legally...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00003
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a letter to the Board. He received a general, under honorable conditions, discharge from the MS ANG for non-participation on 30 October 1993 after 1 year, 9 months and 21 days of service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPPI reviewed this application and recommended denial.