Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03037
Original file (BC-2002-03037.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03037
            INDEX CODE:

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Under  Other  Than  Honorable  Conditions  (UOTHC),  discharge  be
upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was too ill to attend meetings  (Unit  Training  Assembly’s/UTA’s),
and that he notified his superiors that he was ill.  Therefore he  was
unjustifiably put out of the Reserves for lack of participation.

In support of his appeal, applicant has provided a personal statement,
copies of medical and medical insurance documentation, a National
Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of
Service, and a DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty.

His complete submission, including attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his enlistment in the --- Air National Guard  (--
ANG) on 12 November 1979.  He had over nine years prior service in the
Navy, Navy Reserve and ANG.  He had attained the grade of Airman First
Class (A1C/E-3) and entered the ANG at that grade.

Applicant did not attend UTA’s or required  Annual  Training  for  his
entire enlistment period in the ANG.  He was demoted to  Airman  Basic
(AB) effective and with a date of rank of 30 December 1980 due to non-
participation.

On 16 September 1981, applicant’s commander initiated discharge action
against  him  under  the  auspices  of  AFI  36-3209,   Unsatisfactory
Participation.  As a result, on 23 May 1982, a review panel made up of
members from the HQ --- National Guard reviewed the  applicant’s  case
and recommended he be separated with a tentative  characterization  of
service,  under  other  than   honorable   conditions,   and   he   be
involuntarily transferred to the Individual Ready  Reserve  (IRR).   A
subsequent  legal  review  of  the  recommendation  found  it  legally
sufficient.  Applicant was separated for non-participation  on  3 June
1982 with an  UOTHC  discharge.   He  was  discharged  as  an  AB  and
involuntarily transferred to the IRR.

Examiner’s Note: Applicant withdrew his case from consideration on  20
May 2003,  to  gather  additional  supporting  documentation.   On  16
October 2003, his case was reopened at his request.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ ANG/DPPI recommends denial.  DPPI notes in accordance with AFI  36-
3209, members may be discharged when the member has  accumulated  nine
or more unexcused absences within a 12-month  period.   The  applicant
had accrued 120  unexcused  UTA  absences  and  two  unexcused  Annual
Training absences, 2-16 August 1980 and 8-22 August 1981.  DPPI  feels
that  the  discharge  was  conducted  in  accordance  with  prescribed
directives.

DPPI’s evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant has provided additional evidence in the form of a letter
from his psychiatrist  that  concludes  the  applicant  suffered  from
Dysthymic Disorder and Major Depression with Psychotic Features.   His
psychiatrist claims the applicant  had  been  under  psychiatric  care
since 1981.  He also states the applicant has  slowly  made  progress,
completed an undergraduate degree program, and is currently not  under
active treatment.  The applicant states his  illness’s’  effected  his
judgment and rationale in his  daily  functioning  and,  coupled  with
other problems, was the source of what eventually lead  to  his  UOTHC
discharge.  Since he served “honorably” prior to this  period  and  in
light of his health problems at the time, he respectfully requests his
discharge be upgraded.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  While he has provided  a  statement  from  his
attending physician from  18 November  1987  through  6  January  1996
indicating that he may have  suffered  from  "Dysthmic  Disorder"  and
"Major  Depression"  as  early  as  1981,  he  has  not  provided  any
documentation from either a civilian or military doctor to explain the
reasons for his accumulated 120 UTA absences and his unexcused absence
from two required Annual Training events before 1981,  the  basis  for
his discharge.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2002-03037  in  Executive  Session  on  29  October  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Panel Chair
      Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
      Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 Sep 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ ANG/DPPI , dated 6 Mar 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 03.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 1 Oct 03, w/atch.




                                   MARILYN THOMAS
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01031

    Original file (BC-2003-01031.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was provided a general (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge from the -- ANG effective 15 February 2002. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated below. Michael K. Gallogly Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2003-01031 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00326

    Original file (BC-2003-00326.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His character of service was Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) and his reenlistment eligibility was recorded as “Ineligible.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPPI recommends denial. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting a change in his discharge and reenlisment eligibility. Vaughn E. Schlunz Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03004

    Original file (BC-2002-03004.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03004 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under other than honorable conditions, discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was demoted to A1C with an effective and date of rank of 25 October 1994. DPFP notes also that based on the discharge record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01426

    Original file (BC-2003-01426.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a general, (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and while we sympathize with his situation at the time and appreciate his efforts to care for his family, there was simply no evidence presented that justified granting the requested relief; subsequently, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01288

    Original file (BC-2003-01288.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was discharged from the TN ANG for unsatisfactory participation on 31 May 1997 after serving seven years, nine months, and six days of combined Reserve component and Regular Air Force service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and while we sympathize with the applicant’s civilian employment predicament at the time, there is simply no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02977

    Original file (BC-2002-02977.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was warned of an impending demotion in grade from SRA to Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) as a result of his non-participation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02977

    Original file (BC-2002-02977.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was warned of an impending demotion in grade from SRA to Airman First Class (A1C/E-3) as a result of his non-participation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01011

    Original file (BC-2003-01011.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    She accepted and was honorably discharged from active duty and enlisted in the Rhode Island Air National Guard. As a full time deputy, she placed her law enforcement career as a priority over her weekend drill duties in the Guard. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00926

    Original file (BC-2004-00926.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was recommended for discharge for non-participation. In accordance with Air National Guard Instruction (ANGI) 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, “…members may be discharged when the member has accumulated nine or more unexcused absences from UTA within a 12-month period.” The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with prescribed directives and the State’s Staff Judge Advocate found the discharge legally...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00003

    Original file (BC-2003-00003.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a letter to the Board. He received a general, under honorable conditions, discharge from the MS ANG for non-participation on 30 October 1993 after 1 year, 9 months and 21 days of service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPPI reviewed this application and recommended denial.