Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02413
Original file (BC-2002-02413.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02413
            INDEX NUMBER:  110.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  COUNSEL:  None

      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

_____________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  general  (under  honorable  conditions)  discharge  be  upgraded  to
honorable.

_____________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error  or  unjust
and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.

 ____________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C.

_____________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends  denial  of  the  applicant’s  request.   Based  on
documentation in the file, they believe that  the  applicant’s  discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive  requirements  of  the
discharge  regulation.   Additionally,  the  discharge  was  within   the
discretion of the discharge authority.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_____________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant  on  20
September 2002 for review  and  comment  within  30  days.   To  date,  a
response has not been received.

_____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we  agree
with the opinions and recommendation of the Air Force office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our  conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.
Therefore, in the absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_____________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will  only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence
not considered with this application.

_____________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number  02-02413  in
Executive Session on 23 October 2002, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Panel Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
      Mr. James E. Short, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Jul 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFP)C/DPPRS, dated 11 Sep 02.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 Sep 02.




                                   ROSCOE HINTON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202413

    Original file (0202413.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ____________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force found at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Based on documentation in the file, they believe that the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102413

    Original file (0102413.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available limited military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states based upon the lack of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01956

    Original file (BC-2002-01956.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 Sep 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201956

    Original file (0201956.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 20 Sep 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02625

    Original file (BC-2002-02625.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 September 2002, for review and response. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02072

    Original file (BC-2002-02072.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant has not provided any documentation showing he was recommended for the DFC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200073

    Original file (0200073.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00073 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that based on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201105

    Original file (0201105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200188

    Original file (0200188.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The RE code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. After reviewing the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, we are persuaded that some relief is warranted. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00188 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201137

    Original file (0201137.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received an RE Code of 2B, which defined means "Involuntarily separated under AFR 39-10 with a general discharge or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.” Applicant's discharge case file is not in his military personnel records; therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot be verified. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the...