RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01319
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show she is entitled to
a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her request should be considered to receive an annuity under the
Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) or Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
In support of her request, she submits a copy of her deceased
husband's certificate of death and VA Form 21-534, Application for
Dependency and Indemnity Compensation, Death Pension and Accrued
Benefits by A Surviving Spouse or Child.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The RSFPP was in effect prior to the implementation of the SBP.
Members were briefed and required to make their RSFPP elections before
completing 18 years of service. At that time, the spouse notification
was not required.
Applicant and deceased member were married on 8 August 1946. The
deceased member did not enroll in the RSFPP prior to his retirement on
1 June 1963 and did not elect coverage during the initial SBP
enrollment. The member died on 18 March 1982.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPTR recommended denial and stated that there is neither
evidence of error or injustice nor any basis in law to grant relief in
this case. The member had an opportunity to elect SBP coverage for
the applicant but failed to do so. SBP is similar to commercial life
insurance in that an individual must elect to participate and pay the
associated premiums in order to have coverage. The applicant does not
explain delaying over twenty years since the member's death in seeking
correction. It would be inequitable to those members who chose to
participate when eligible and subsequently received reduced retired
pay, and to other widows whose sponsors chose not to participate, to
provide entitlement to this widow on the basis of the evidence
presented. However, if the decision of the Board is to grant relief,
the decedent's record should be corrected to show that on 21
September 1972 he made an SBP election for spouse only coverage based
on full retired pay. Approval should be contingent upon the recovery
of premiums the decedent would have paid if he had made the election
at that time.
AFPC/DPPTR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10
May 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After a thorough review
of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded that deceased member’s records should be altered so that she
would receive an SBP annuity. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted;
however, we do not find these assertions, in and by themselves,
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air
Force. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force
and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that
the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of having suffered
either an error or an injustice. In view of the above and absent
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01319
in Executive Session on 16 August 2002 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 2 May 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Chair
The deceased member did not enroll in the RSFPP prior to his retirement on 1 June 1963 and did not elect coverage during the initial SBP enrollment. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommended denial and stated that there is neither evidence of error or injustice nor any basis in law to grant relief in this case. However, if the decision of the Board is to grant relief, the decedent's record should be corrected to show that...
The evidence also establishes the deceased member’s efforts to provide the applicant with all the benefits she was entitled to as the spouse of a retired service member. Microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters were mailed to the address the decedent provided to the finance center during the 1981-1982 and 1992-1993 open enrollment periods. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03764
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR recommend that applicant’s request be denied and stated that there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice, or merit in fact, nor basis in law to approve this case. Briefing material used at the time the member completed his RSFPP election clearly stated that “dependents acquired after you retire are not eligible to receive Family Protection Plan annuity payments,” payments would only...
He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 1992 open enrollment. However, spouse premiums could be terminated following divorce if the member additionally selected Option 4. He could have elected former spouse SBP coverage for her during the 92 open enrollment.
On 12 Jun 73, the deceased member submitted an SBP election statement during the initial enrollment period, declining coverage. Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an 18-month enrollment period for retired members to elect SBP coverage. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her late husband’s records should be corrected to show that he elected SBP coverage for her.
The decedent and the applicant married on 4 Jun 79 and coverage and premiums were reinstated on the first anniversary of their marriage. As a result of the CG’s decision, the AFBCMR advised the applicant by letter dated 17 Sep 98 that, since the Board lacked the authority to approve claims that were filed more than six years after the death of the service member, her case was being returned and administratively closed (Exhibit D). Notwithstanding her on again/off again marriage to the...
On 22 Apr 02, DPPTR sent a letter to the applicant requesting that she provide a sworn, notarized statement in which she attested that she did not receive notification that her husband had declined SBP coverage at the time of his retirement and that she provide a statement acknowledging and understanding that, if her husband's records are changed, the unpaid contributions (approximately $27,660) will be collected from any annuity payment she would be entitled to receive. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01439
Had the member elected SBP coverage based on full retired pay, the monthly cost would have been approximately $157 at the time of his death and the annuity would have been no less than $1,335. Furthermore, the Air Force may not pay an SBP annuity to the applicant because the member retired before the implementation of the SBP and he did not choose to provide SBP coverage on her behalf. It is possible that since the premiums were still being deducted from the member’s retired pay after the...
There were no provisions in the laws during these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify spouses of retired members if the member did not enroll. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states that microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters mailed to the decedent during the 1981 - 1982 and 1992 - 1993 open enrollment periods were mailed to the decedent’s address...
HQ AFPC/JA informally advised the AFBCMR Staff that unless the divorced party can prove, either in a court of the country in which the divorce was obtained or in a United States court, that the foreign divorce was not in compliance with the laws of the foreign country, the divorce cannot be voided. If legally married to the decedent at the time the POA was issued, the applicant should have been entitled to a dependent ID card. The Chief advises that, should the Board grant relief, approval...