RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02467
INDEX CODE: 110.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation be changed or removed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response which
is attached at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis
to disturb the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02467 in Executive Session on 1 Oct 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. James E. Short, Member
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Jul 02.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 16 Aug 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 02.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Aug 02 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01357 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed to allow her to enlist in the Army. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code the...
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code 4H "Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)" the applicant received is correct (Exhibit D). However, at the time of separation he was serving a suspended punishment under the provisions of Article 15. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 16 Aug 02 for review and response. After careful...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS reviewed applicant's request and recommends denial. DPPRRP states that the applicant, a prior service master...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02795
The reason for this action was that on 1 and 6 December 2001 he failed to refrain from providing alcohol for a person under age 21, and received an Article 15 with a $375 forfeiture of pay. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01855
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states in 1950 he put in for his discharge thinking that his leave time accrued would be included in his time served. He is unable to work and was hoping the discharge date can be changed to include his leave time (Exhibit E). Based on the limited documentation in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02770
On 2 Jul 98, applicant requested a hardship discharge based on family difficulties. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. Additionally, we note the assigned RE code of 4A is a code that can be waived for prior service enlistment consideration, provided applicant meets all other requirements for enlistment under an existing prior service program, and depending on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02771
On 4 December 2000, the commander notified the applicant that he was recommending a discharge for a pattern of minor disciplinary infractions and recommended a general discharge. He received an Article 15 on 14 November 2000 for disorderly conduct, and Record of Individual Counseling (ROC), 29 September 2000, for failure to go to appointed place of duty on time and 31 August 2000, for failure to keep dormitory room in inspection order. At the time members are separated from the Air Force,...