RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02378
INDEX NUMBER: 100.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased husband’s DD Form 214s be corrected to show his Date
of Birth (DOB) as September 20, 1934.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSAMP reviewed this application and recommended denial. A
review of the deceased military member’s military records shows his
DOB throughout his period of service as 20 March 1937. A certified
copy of her deceased husband’s birth certificate was requested,
however, the requested documentation has not been provided.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 11 Jan 02 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits
of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission
of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 26 February 2002, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jun 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSAMP, dated 12 Dec 01, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 02, w/atchs.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01857
When the applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 12 January 1950, he completed the NME Form 4, Enlistment Record – United States Air Force. The Board is persuaded that the applicant has provided sufficient documentation to warrant a change to his DD Form 214. In view of the above the Board recommends that his record be corrected to the extent indicated below _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02316
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSAMP recommended denial of the applicant’s request for a name change. If the court order was dated on or before the applicant’s discharge date, a correction would be possible. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03291
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03291 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that his grade at the time of discharge was technical sergeant (E-6). ...
DPSAMP forwarded a letter to the applicant requesting a copy of his birth certificate, however, as of this date the applicant has not provided the required verification. Therefore, we recommend his records as indicated below. Exhibit B.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPSAMP recommends the application be denied. With regards to inserting applicant’s personal statement in his Master Personnel Records (MPR), we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the appropriate Air Force office, HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01850
Although the discharge was proper, the applicant may now meet enlistment medical standards and the evidence warrants a change of RE code. The Consultant recommends approval but adds that a change of RE code by the Board is not equivalent to a finding of medically qualified for enlistment and does not guarantee acceptance by the Air Force for enlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE advises the 4C RE code was applied in accordance with governing...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-01765 INDEX CODE 131.10 102.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be afforded a special records review regarding his promotability to the grade of lieutenant colonel (LTC) on the Aug 67 promotion cycle and he be promoted retroactively to LTC, or at least to LTC in the Retired...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03389 INDEX NUMBER: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He indicates that he would be willing to make a personal appearance to the Board to discuss his side of the story. As of this date, no response has been received by...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 00-01657 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect that he served in the 44th Fighter Bomber Squadron at Clark AFB during the Korean War and that he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Japan (Johnson AFB) and Formosa for a period of 90-plus days. ...
Her husband’s date of discharge be corrected to reflect that he was discharged in 1946 versus 1950. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter(s) prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D &E. Pursuant to the Board’s request for information, the FBI indicated that, on the basis of the evidence provided, they were unable to locate an arrest record pertaining to the former...