Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101856
Original file (0101856.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-01856
            INDEX NUMBER:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

Applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release  or
Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect  award  of  the
National  Intelligence   Medal   of   Achievement,   the   National
Reconnaissance Office Gold Medal,  and  the  National  Intelligence
Meritorious Unit Citation.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request  and
provided  an  advisory  opinion  to  the  Board  recommending   the
application be  denied  (Exhibit  C).   The  advisory  opinion  was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within  30 days
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response  has  been  received  by
this office.

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request   and   the
available evidence of record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of
error or injustice to warrant corrective  action.   The  facts  and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based  on  the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.  Absent
persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which  entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards
were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is  final  and
will only be reconsidered upon the  presentation  of  new  relevant
evidence, which was not available at the time the  application  was
filed.

Members of the Board, Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Mr. Roscoe  Hinton,
Jr., and Mr.  Philip  Sheuerman,  considered  this  application  on
30 October 2001, in accordance with the  provisions  of  Air  Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.



      DAVID C. VAN GASBECK

      Panel Chair


Exhibits:
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149, dtd 30 Jun 2001, w/atchs
B.  Available Master Personnel Records
C.  Advisory Opinion
D.  SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101933

    Original file (0101933.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101182

    Original file (0101182.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101220

    Original file (0101220.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101387

    Original file (0101387.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100080

    Original file (0100080.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003031

    Original file (0003031.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002141

    Original file (0002141.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002602

    Original file (0002602.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101000

    Original file (0101000.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101827

    Original file (0101827.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.