Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101660
Original file (0101660.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 IN THE MATTER OF:     DOCKET NUMBER:  01-01660
            INDEX CODE 100.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


Applicant requests his Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance  (SGLI)
election for “NO” coverage, dated 16 April 1997, be honored and he  be
reimbursed for the monthly premiums deducted from his April  2001  pay
for SGLI coverage of $250,000.  Applicant's submission is  at  Exhibit
A.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's  request  on  3
occasions and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application  be  denied  (Exhibit  B).   The  advisory  opinions  were
forwarded to the  applicant  for  review  and  response  (Exhibit  C).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit D.

After careful consideration of applicant's request and  the  available
evidence  of  record,  we  find  insufficient  evidence  of  error  or
injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of  record
and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.  Absent persuasive
evidence applicant was denied rights to  which  entitled,  appropriate
regulations were not  followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were  not
applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

The Board staff is directed to  inform  applicant  of  this  decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of  new  relevant  evidence
which was not available at the time the application was filed.

Members of the Board Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Mr. Jackson  A.  Hauslein,
and Mr. Edward H. Parker considered this application on
1  April  02  ,  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.

                       JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                         Panel Chair

Exhibits:
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149
B.  Advisory Opinions, dated 18 Jul 01, 31 Oct 01, and 6 Dec 01
C.  SAF/MIBR, SAF/MRBR and AFBCMR Ltrs Forwarding Advisory
    Opinions
D.  Applicant’s Responses, dated 21 Aug and 14 Nov 01

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102473

    Original file (0102473.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101620

    Original file (0101620.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is attached at Exhibit D. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102246

    Original file (0102246.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102217

    Original file (0102217.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102218

    Original file (0102218.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102522

    Original file (0102522.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101824

    Original file (0101824.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102221

    Original file (0102221.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102123

    Original file (0102123.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101505

    Original file (0101505.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.