RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01753
INDEX NUMBER: 110.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United
States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his
discharge date as April 1967. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force are unknown
inasmuch as no military records were available. A copy of the
applicant’s Report of Separation, obtained from the Dept of Veterans
Affairs, reflects that the applicant entered active duty on 19
December 1966 and was honorably discharged on 5 January 1967, under
the provisions of AFM 39-10, para 3-8Q (Convenience of the
Government). He was credited with 17 days of active duty service.
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we found
insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. Based upon the presumption
of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without
evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the applicant's
discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate directives.
Therefore, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this
application.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence
which was not reasonably available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board, Mr. John L. Robuck, Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, considered this application on 06 December 2001
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and
the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
JOHN L. ROBUCK
Panel Chair
Exhibit:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we found insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair Exhibit: A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO. The applicant’s separation orders indicate that he was discharged under honorable conditions in the grade of airman basic on 20 November 1958 under the provisions of AFR 39-16 by reason of “Discharge of Unproductive Airman.” No further information concerning the applicant’s service is available. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03967
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Before his death, her husband told her that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal while serving in Vietnam. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states she is not asking for her husband to be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. ...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
On 10 June 1977, the applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable was considered and denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of the appeal, the board majority is persuaded that an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge is warranted. ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.