RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03326
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE
SSN HEARING DESIRED: YES
Applicant requests his Undesirable Discharge be upgraded. Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973.
Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot
be verified.
After careful consideration of applicant’s request, we note that there are
no records available for review and applicant has not provided
documentation revealing the circumstances of his discharge. Therefore, we
have no records upon which to determine whether or not applicant’s
separation was appropriate. However, based on the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to
the contrary, we must assume that the applicant’s discharge was proper and
in compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Mr. Joseph A. Roj and Mr.
Lawrence R. Leehy considered this application on March 8, 2001 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Military Personnel Records
C. SAF/MIBR Letter dated 1 Feb 01
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00110 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE SSN HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests his Undesirable Discharge be upgraded to a General (Under Honorable Conditions) Discharge. Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
: 00-01751 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES The applicant requests the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214 be changed and a new DD Form 256 be issued. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions are at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.