RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03310
INDEX CODE: 110.00
APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE
SSN HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests his Under Honorable (General) Discharge be upgraded to
an Honorable Discharge. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided
an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied
(Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied
applicant's request to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable on
28 June 1996 (Exhibit D). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant’s request, we note that there are
no records available for review and applicant has not provided
documentation revealing the circumstances of his discharge. Therefore, we
have no records upon which to determine whether or not applicant’s
separation was appropriate. However, based on the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to
the contrary, we must assume that the applicant’s discharge was proper and
in compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry Romo, Jr., Mr. Joseph A. Roj and Ms. Brenda
L. Romine considered this application on April 4, 2001 in accordance with
the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute,
10, U.S.C. 1552.
HENRY ROMO, JR.
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Military Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. Discharge Review Board Brief
E. SAF/MIBR Ltr dated 9 Feb 01
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant or counsel. Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.