RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02180
INDEX CODE: 100.00, 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his DD Form 214s (Report of Separation From
Active Duty)/(Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer
or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and
additional awards. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's requests and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending denial of
applicant’s request for the Presidential Unit Citation (Exhibit C).
The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and
response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion
is at Exhibit E.
We note that the corrective actions the applicant requested have
been resolved through pertinent administrative procedures and have
been added to his DD Form 214s and he has been issued DD Form 215s
(Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From
Active Duty).
Regarding applicant’s request for award of the Presidential Unit
Citation, after reviewing the documentation submitted, the Board is
convinced he was assigned to Detachment 15 at the time the
Presidential Unit Citation was awarded (2 Jun 67 - 31 Mar 69).
However, after checking with officials in the Recognition Program
Branch, it appears that since applicant was in a temporary duty
(TDY) status rather than a permanent status, he does not qualify for
the Presidential Unit Citation. In view of the foregoing and in the
absence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend the applicant
be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not available at the time the application was
filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Teddy L. Houston, Mr. John L. Robuck, and
Mr. Edward H. Parker considered this application on 8 May 2001 in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and
the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
TEDDY L. HOUSTON
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
E. Applicant's Response
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. We noted that consequent to a similar request submitted by the applicant in 1983, orders were...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant and counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.