RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00177
INDEX NUMBER: 108.09
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show his grade was E-4,
rather than E-3. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force are contained
in his military records, which are attached at Exhibit B.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and
provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application
be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated
in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record
and have not been rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence
applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations
were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will
only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence,
which was not available at the time the application was filed.
Members of the Board, Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Ms. Kathy L.
Boockholdt, and Mr. Mike Novel, considered this application on 23 May
2000, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
BARBARA A. WESTGATE
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149, dtd 18 Jan 00, w/atchs
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion, w/atchs
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). Counsel’s response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response, within 30 days (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to counsel for review and response (Exhibit C). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00172 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) following his marriage on 10 July 1993. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00172 INDEX NUMBER: 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) following his marriage on 10 July 1993. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02575 INDEX CODE: 137 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING: NO The applicant requests that he be allowed to establish Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit C).
It appears that the responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge. Under our broader mandate and after careful consideration of all the facts and circumstances of applicant's case, the majority of the Board is persuaded the applicant has been a productive member of society. Applicant's...