RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01798
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC)
discharge be upgraded. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in 1973.
Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force cannot
be verified.
The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
After careful consideration of applicant’s request, we note that there are
no records available for review and applicant has not provided
documentation revealing the circumstances of his discharge. Therefore, we
have no records upon which to determine whether or not applicant’s
separation was appropriate. However, based on the presumption of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and without evidence to
the contrary, we must assume that the applicant’s discharge was proper and
in compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy and Ms.
Leta L. O’Connor considered this application on 9 November 1999, in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the
governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
TERRY A. YONKERS
Panel Chair
Exhibit:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01583 INDEX CODE: 113.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that her late husband’s records be corrected to show that he had foreign service. However, applicant has provided a copy of her husband’s DD Form 214, (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States). TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be granted (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion E. FBI Report F. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding FBI Report
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. In view of the lack of documentation provided by the applicant pertaining to his post-service activities, as well as the lack of information regarding the circumstances of his separation from the service, we do not find the documentation sufficient to warrant favorable action based on clemency. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant and his counsel for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the limited available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. TERRY A. YONKERS Panel Chair Exhibits: A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.