Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9901211
Original file (9901211.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  99-01211
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


Applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to  honorable.
 Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

Applicant's military personnel records  were  destroyed  by  fire  in  1973.
Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the  Air  Force  cannot
be verified.

After careful consideration of applicant’s request, we note that  there  are
no  records  available  for  review   and   applicant   has   not   provided
documentation revealing the circumstances of his discharge.   Therefore,  we
have  no  records  upon  which  to  determine  whether  or  not  applicant’s
separation  was  appropriate.   However,  based  on   the   presumption   of
regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs and  without  evidence  to
the contrary, we must assume that the applicant’s discharge was  proper  and
in compliance with appropriate directives.   Therefore,  we  find  no  basis
upon which to favorably consider this application.

The  Board  staff  is  directed  to  inform  applicant  of  this   decision.
Applicant  should  also  be  informed  that  this  decision  is  final   and
application was filed.

Members of the Board Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Mr. Terry A. Yonkers and Ms.  Leta
L. O’Connor considered this application on 17 September 1999, in  accordance
with the provisions of Air Force  Instruction  36-2603,  and  the  governing
statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.




                       WAYNE R. GRACIE
                                Panel Chair

Exhibits:

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102370

    Original file (0102370.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800663

    Original file (9800663.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00663

    Original file (BC-1998-00663.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900566

    Original file (9900566.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit E). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9903135

    Original file (9903135.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Counsel's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900495

    Original file (9900495.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9901430

    Original file (9901430.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 29 Mar 99. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900814

    Original file (9900814.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00814 INDEX CODE: 131 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING: NO The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101247

    Original file (0101247.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900036

    Original file (9900036.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.