-
IN THE MATTER OF:
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NO: 97- 03737
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his removal from flying status be
declared void. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Applicant has provided a response (Exhibit E).
The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Robert D. Stuart, Mr. Henry Romo Jr. ,
and Mr. Richard A; Peterson, considered this application on
15 October 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36 - 2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552.
ROBERT D. STUART
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D.
E. Applicant's Response
AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Background: During our review we were unable to locate documents that confirmed review his personal file m e r f o r m e d TDYs while assigned overseas.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The first is whether the Board should waive the three year statute of limitations.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . FACTS: The applicant states that his discharge would not have occurred had it not been for a report filed by a psychologist who evaluated him by direction of his commander. Applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received, change his...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application -be denied ( E x h i b i t C ) . Eligibility for disability processing is established by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when that board finds that the member may not be qualified for continued military service. Member concurred with the findings and recommendation of the IPEB and, subsequently officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The available records clearly indicate that applicant received a dishonorable discharge from the general court and that portion of his sentence was upheld on appeal and ultimately executed by the convening authority. The Board of review found merit in applicant’s argument and provided him relief in the form of a dismissal of the...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: 067 2 9 I998 DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 9 7 6 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REO UESTS THAT: His discharge be characterized as honorable and the narrative reason for his separation be changed. I+ AIR FO RCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed this application and states that in order to correct an injustice of improperly labeling the applicant's disorder, the...
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 95-01123 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated on active duty to complete service for length of service retirement, or favorable consideration for the Voluntary Separation Incentive/Special Separation Bonus (VSI/SSB). ...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1995-01123A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 95-01123 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated on active duty to complete service for length of service retirement, or favorable consideration for the Voluntary Separation Incentive/Special Separation Bonus (VSI/SSB). ...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Separations Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that they concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant's recommendation that the applicant's reason for separation should be changed to "Secretarial Authority" with a SPD of "KFF." The Board notes that the AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214...