Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703545
Original file (9703545.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
- 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

JUL 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

DOCKET NUMBER:  97-03545 

COUNSEL:  NONE 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

t 

Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 
be 
changed from 2C  to 1,  and his entry level separation be changed 
to general.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A .  
The appropriate Air  Force offices evaluated applicant's request 
and  provided  advisory  opinions  to  the  Board  recommending  the 
application be  denied  (Exhibit C).  The  advisory opinions were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response  (Exhibit D). 
Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available  evidence of  record, we  find  insufficient  evidence of 
error or injustice to warrant  corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be  based  on 
the evidence of  record and have not been adequately rebutted by 
applicant. 
Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied 
rights  to  which  entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not 
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we  find no 
basis to disturb the existing record. 

.. - 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will  only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of  new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members  of  the  Board  Ms.  Charlene  M.  Bradley,  Dr.  Gerald  B. 
Kauvar, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application on 
30  Jun  98  in  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  Air  Force 
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552. 

CHARLENE M. BRADLEY 
Panel Chair 

Exhibits : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form  149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinions 
D. 
E.  Applicant's Response 

SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions 

DEPARTMENT  O F  THE A I R   FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS AIR  FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER 

RANDOLPH AIR  FORCE  BASE TEXAS  : 

'JAN 1 G  1998 

M E M O W D U M  FOR AFBCMR 
FROM:  HQ AFPCDPPRS 

550 C Street West Ste 11 
Randolph AFB TX  781 50-471 3 

The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman, was separated from the Air Force 3 1 Aug 

95 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Entry level Performance and Conduct) with an 
uncharacterized discharge. He served 05 months and 02 days total active service. 

Requested Action.  The applicant is requesting a change in his reentry code.  This advisory 
will address only the discharge processing in the case.  AFPC/DPPAES should address the ' 
reedistment code issue. 

Basis for Request.  Applicant claims his reason for receiving unsatisfactory academic. scores in 

training was because he was unhappy with his career field.'  He further states his minor 
inhctions were due to such things as miscommunications, his failure to check the message 
board and his lack of knowledge of a briefing detailing him for-CQ/Dorm Guard. 

Facts.  The applicant was notified by his commander on 24 Aug 95 that discharge action had 
been initiated against him for entry level performance or conduct.  The commander indicated his 
action was being recommended because of applicant's failure to make satisfactory progress in a 
required training program and his minor disciplinary irdiactions. Applicant had failed Blocks V, 
VI and IX with scores of 60% and passing score was 70%.  In addition, he had received two 
Letters of Reprimand and two Records of Counseling for minor disciplinary infractions.  The 
commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would 
be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air 
Force.  He was advised he had a right to consult counsel and the right to submit statements in his 
own behalf.  He waived his right to consulted counsel and did not submitted statements in his 
own behalf. On 29 Aug 95,  the discharge authority approved the Entry Level Separation. 
Airmen are given entry level separatioduncharacterized service characterization whea separation 
action is initiated against them in the first 180 days of continuous active service. 

Discussion. This case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no errors or 

irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant.  The discharge complies with directives in 
effect at the time of his discharge.  The records indicate member's military service was reviewed 
and appropriate action was taken. 

Recommendation. Applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge processing 

nor pmvide facts which wwant a change in the discharge he received. Accordingly, we 
re&-mend applicant's request be denied.  He has filed a timely request. 

Military Personnel Mgmt Spec 
Separations Branch 
Dir of Personnel Program Management 

DEPARTMENT OF T H E  A I R   F O R C E  

HEADQUARTERS  AIR  FORCE  PERSONNEL CENTER 

RANDOLPH AIR  FORCE BASE TEXAS 

MEMORANDUM FOR  AFBCMR 

.  FROM:  HQAFPCDPPAES 

550 C Street West Ste 10 
.Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 

A review of applicant’s case file was conducted.  The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) 

Code “2C” is correct.  The type of discharge &ove  assignment of the RE code. 

Special Programs and BCMR Manager 
Dir of Personnel Program Management 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801584

    Original file (9801584.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801989

    Original file (9801989.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800678

    Original file (9800678.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Requested Action, The applicant is requesting a change in his separation and reentry codes which would allow him to reenlist in the Air Force reserves. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate counseling was provided and appropriate action was taken.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802388

    Original file (9802388.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802388

    Original file (9802388.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801555

    Original file (9801555.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800666

    Original file (9800666.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). He applies now to change his reenlistment code from "2Q" to one that will allow reentry to the military if and when he might choose.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800815

    Original file (9800815.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. undesirable discharge be upgraded to The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s commander recommended involuntary discharge be taken against the applicant for admitted homosexuality. The case was processed to the discharge authority and on 17 Oct 55 the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharge with an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9701398

    Original file (9701398.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Apr 98, the applicant provided additional evidence and requested that the Board reconsider her application (Exhibit F) . The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The discharge complies with directives in effect at the time of her discharge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800767

    Original file (9800767.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    under honorable submission is at The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C, Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 2 c DEPARTMENT O F T H E AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713 SUBJECT: Application for Correction...