-
IN THE MATTER OF:
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
JUL
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03545
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
t
Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
be
changed from 2C to 1, and his entry level separation be changed
to general. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A .
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
.. -
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Dr. Gerald B.
Kauvar, and Ms. Patricia D. Vestal considered this application on
30 Jun 98 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D.
E. Applicant's Response
SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
DEPARTMENT O F THE A I R FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS :
'JAN 1 G 1998
M E M O W D U M FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS
550 C Street West Ste 11
Randolph AFB TX 781 50-471 3
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman, was separated from the Air Force 3 1 Aug
95 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Entry level Performance and Conduct) with an
uncharacterized discharge. He served 05 months and 02 days total active service.
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting a change in his reentry code. This advisory
will address only the discharge processing in the case. AFPC/DPPAES should address the '
reedistment code issue.
Basis for Request. Applicant claims his reason for receiving unsatisfactory academic. scores in
training was because he was unhappy with his career field.' He further states his minor
inhctions were due to such things as miscommunications, his failure to check the message
board and his lack of knowledge of a briefing detailing him for-CQ/Dorm Guard.
Facts. The applicant was notified by his commander on 24 Aug 95 that discharge action had
been initiated against him for entry level performance or conduct. The commander indicated his
action was being recommended because of applicant's failure to make satisfactory progress in a
required training program and his minor disciplinary irdiactions. Applicant had failed Blocks V,
VI and IX with scores of 60% and passing score was 70%. In addition, he had received two
Letters of Reprimand and two Records of Counseling for minor disciplinary infractions. The
commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would
be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air
Force. He was advised he had a right to consult counsel and the right to submit statements in his
own behalf. He waived his right to consulted counsel and did not submitted statements in his
own behalf. On 29 Aug 95, the discharge authority approved the Entry Level Separation.
Airmen are given entry level separatioduncharacterized service characterization whea separation
action is initiated against them in the first 180 days of continuous active service.
Discussion. This case has been reviewed for separation processing and there are no errors or
irregularities causing an injustice to the applicant. The discharge complies with directives in
effect at the time of his discharge. The records indicate member's military service was reviewed
and appropriate action was taken.
Recommendation. Applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge processing
nor pmvide facts which wwant a change in the discharge he received. Accordingly, we
re&-mend applicant's request be denied. He has filed a timely request.
Military Personnel Mgmt Spec
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
DEPARTMENT OF T H E A I R F O R C E
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
. FROM: HQAFPCDPPAES
550 C Street West Ste 10
.Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712
A review of applicant’s case file was conducted. The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE)
Code “2C” is correct. The type of discharge &ove assignment of the RE code.
Special Programs and BCMR Manager
Dir of Personnel Program Management
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the ‘“application be denied (Exhibit C) . Requested Action. The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Requested Action, The applicant is requesting a change in his separation and reentry codes which would allow him to reenlist in the Air Force reserves. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate counseling was provided and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Applicant did not identifjl any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant a change in the...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). He applies now to change his reenlistment code from "2Q" to one that will allow reentry to the military if and when he might choose.
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. undesirable discharge be upgraded to The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant’s commander recommended involuntary discharge be taken against the applicant for admitted homosexuality. The case was processed to the discharge authority and on 17 Oct 55 the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharge with an...
On 28 Apr 98, the applicant provided additional evidence and requested that the Board reconsider her application (Exhibit F) . The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The discharge complies with directives in effect at the time of her discharge.
under honorable submission is at The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C, Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 2 c DEPARTMENT O F T H E AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4713 SUBJECT: Application for Correction...