Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703375
Original file (9703375.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                                                               JUL 20 1998
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                                                   DOCKET
NUMBER: 97-03375
                                                   INDEX CODE : 137.03

                                                   COUNSEL: NONE

                                                    HEARING DESIRED: NO

Applicant requests termination of his coverage under  the  Survivor  Benefit
Plan (SBP).  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.

The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and  provided
tan advisory opinion to the Board recommending  the  application  be  denied
(Exhibit C).  The advisory  opinion  was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for
review and response (Exhibit D).  As of this  date,  no  response  has  been
received by this office.

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the  available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or  injustice  to
warrant corrective action.  The facts and opinions stated  in  the  advisory
opinion appear to be based on the evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been
rebutted by applicant.  Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find  no  basis  to  disturb  the
existing record.  Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.

However, Public  Law  (PL)  105-85  (effective  17  May  1998)  provides  an
opportunity for retirees to terminate participation in the SBP beginning  on
the second  anniversary  of  their  receipt  of  retired  pay-  For  further
information,  applicant  should  contact   the   Retiree   Services   Branch
(AFPC/DPPTR) at 1-800-531-7502.

The  Board  staff  is  directed  to  inform  applicant  of  this   decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will  only
be reconsidered upon the presentation of new  relevant  evidence  which  was
not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.

Members of the Board, Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, and
Mr. David C. VanGasbeck considered this application on 16 July 1998, in
accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603 and the
governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.

                                                C. SAUNDERS
                                                Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A.    Applicant's DD Form 149
B.    Available Master Personnel Records
C.    Advisory Opinion
D.    SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9603312

    Original file (9603312.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702967

    Original file (9702967.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided tan advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703546

    Original file (9703546.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703771

    Original file (9703771.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). However, Public Law (PL) 105-85 (effective 17 May 1998) provides an opportunity for retirees to terminate participation in the SBP beginning on the second anniversary of their receipt of retired Pay - For further information, applicant should contact the Retiree Services Branch (AFPC/DPPTR) at 1-800-531-7502. Backaround: When the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703293

    Original file (9703293.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - I I COUNSEL: None - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS JUL 1 7 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-03293 HEARING DESIRED: NO - Applicant requests that the one year eligibility period for a spouse acquired after retirement be waived and she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. I The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9700619

    Original file (9700619.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force indicated the applicant elected reduced spouse and child coverage The SBP counselor at d o ; F B , Nevada, provided verification that the applicant‘s wife did not attend the 4 Sep 96 SBP pre-retirement briefing. There is no evidence of error or injustice in this case and DPPTR recommends the requested relief be denied. The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 21 May 98, under the provisions of Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703799

    Original file (9703799.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 2 0 = IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-03799 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes Applicant requests her record be changed to show she declined to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) when she was first eligible. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Accordingly,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703033

    Original file (9703033.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion E. Applicant's Response DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCIOPPTR 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph A f 6 TX 78150-471 3 SUBJECT;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9700262

    Original file (9700262.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has insurance coverage. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. - APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 July 1997 for review and comment within 30 days. In fact, the available evidence clearly indicates that the applicant was counseled regarding the costs of participating in the SBP and he did elect to participate.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703450

    Original file (9703450.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a member fails to complete an SBP election prior to retirement, coverage is established for all eligible beneficiaries by operation of law. Title 10 USC Section 1448 (a) (3) requires that the spouse of a married member must concur in any election that provides less than full spouse SBP coverage. The statement from the member's husband concurring in her election to decline coverage is inappropriate in that he does not clearly acknowledge retired pay ceases when the member dies, that he...