NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0280 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0287 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 November 2011, you signed and acknowledged that you were being administratively separated due to fraudulent entry based on your failure to disclose vital mental health information which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0289 14
A three- -member panel of the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your a application on 12 March 2014. The Board found that the assignment of an RE-1C reentry code was warranted by the counseling entry of 15 February 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0295 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, -regulations, and policies. «Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the | .existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0298 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. present in your case, such as your many years of honorable service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0303 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0306 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. On 26 July 2013, you were separated from active duty with an honorable characterization of service, transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve, and assigned an RE-4B (assigned when there is a military or civil record of in-service illegal drug involvement and no further potential for service) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0315 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0321 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-2C (transferred to the Fleet Marine Corps Reserve (FMCR) at maximum service limitation for grade) reentry code, issued on 12 April 2012, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0323 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her RE-4 (not recommended for. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman and Exnicios and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0324 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0326 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO0O0326-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0330 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. You were released from active duty and , transferred to the reserve component on 28 September 2013, with an honorable characterization of service and assigned an RE-3C (when directed by the Commandant of the Marine Corps or when eligible and disqualifying factor is not covered by any other code) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0333 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 1 is oh Ss oo DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0334 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0337 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) dated After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0348 14
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0393 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0396 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N323 of 25 Mar 14, a copy of which is attached and was previously sent to you for comments to which you failed to respond. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0397 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Separation due ~ to unsuitability (personality disorder) with a general, characterization of service... You were so discharged on 1 November ; 1976, and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is -on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0405 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. - After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire ‘record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when, applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0406 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser 1130C/14U0650 dated 27 May 2014, a COpy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to gGemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0411 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, - regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No,.NRO0411-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0424 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2014. You also received an adverse performance evaluation for 16 September 2010 to 6 February 2011. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0431 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered our application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0432 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to receive Assignment Incentive Pay (AIP) from 5 April 2012 to 15 August 2013 at a rate of $750.00 per month. The Board, consisting of Messrs, Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0438 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0440 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0441 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0442 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0445 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0446 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0447 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0449 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser a13/101 dated 3 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0450 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR04500 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0451 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You were separated on 9 December 2012, with an honorable discharge due to non-retention on active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0452 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0454 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0458 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You submitted a request for a hardship discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0461 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is authorized to be paid dive pay for having designator 113X (SEAL Officer), at the rate of $240.00 per month vice $150.00 per month from 13 January 2003 through 24 August 2012. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0478 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In-addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), dated 18 June 2013, a copy cof which is attached. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0488 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by removing derogatory material regarding charges referred to a special court-martial (SPCM). f. On 9 August 2013 Petitioner was issued and subsequently signed an administrative remarks (Page 13) entry which stated that his recommendation for advancement to paygrade E-7 was being withdrawn due to a pending investigation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. If the score received mects or exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement, Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0514 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan coverage with spousal concurrence, prior to his retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action ‘indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0523 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0525 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1004 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0529 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100" ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. In addition, the Board on furnished by HoMc memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 9 May 2014, 4 copy of which is attached. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0530 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Subsequently, on 11 June 2012, you were discharged with an honorable characterization of service discharge and assigned an RE-3K (disenrolled from Naval Academy or other officer program) reentry code. *consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...