NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7412-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7422 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement cycle. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7437 13
This is in reference to your appli record pursuant to the provisions f the Board for Correction of Naval Fecords, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correc 1 record, the burden is on the applicant to demon f£ probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7444 13
2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (5), PERS-81 stated that “an advisory to the petitioner’s request cannot be completed.” e. In enclosure (6), PERS-803, the NPC office with cognizance over enlisted advancements, has commented to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7448 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to waive Petitioner’s debt incurred as a result of mispayments. The Board, consisting of Mr. zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7472 13
Documentary material considered by of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determ copy of which was consideration of the idence submitted was probable material ination, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for iously considered by ortant to keep in mind to all official a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7474 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application: on 11 Decembér 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 21 July 2009, your command attempted to notify you that administrative discharge procedures had been initiated and that you could receive a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7482-13
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected at to issue an” ‘immediate reenlistment contract. Note: in those cases where a member is entitled to an Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) Contract, PERS-93 will create the Reserve Contract document as well as facilitate the Petitioner's gain ‘into the IRR, and will make the required distribution of the contract based on this action. c. A copy of this eee of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR750 13
A three-member’ panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when a Marine is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7509 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of fF GP 2 copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7514 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 761 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7520 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of Cay WER a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7529 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP} when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7531 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 June 2009 to 31 May 2010 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Spooner, Swarens and Wilson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7532 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ortieial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7536 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7538 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7540 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7542 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7544 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. The sentence at your SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). On 7 March 1990, after appellate review, you received the BCD.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7547 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1048 Gated x, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7548 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7014S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. On 11 May 1954, you received the undesirable characterization of service due to unfitness.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7558 13
The ADB found that you had committed misconduct, and recommended that you be discharged with a general characterization of service. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your act of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7561 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. Characterization of service is based in part on conduct marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7563 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7573 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 12 August 2014. On 29 August 1995, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7582 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. Characterization of service is based, in part, on trait marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7585 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2014. The sentence at your second SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). ‘Consequently, wHen applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7592 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found those factors insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service, given your record of one NJP for wrongful use of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7594 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You elected to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7599 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were so discharged on 18 April 1997 and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7600 13
The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Grover, and Mr. Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ‘The Board particularly notes that he received the Good Conduct Medal and this was his only offense during more than three years of service, Moreover Petitioner’s commanding officer recommended that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7601 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 3 October 1990, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of misconduct: (drug abuse).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7626 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7629 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors present in your case, such as your prior honorable service. '.Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official «maval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7639-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ; application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7657 13
The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. Tollefson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. Petitioner enlisted on 8 September 1988. That Petitioner's naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7661 13
Pursuant to the |provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to provide reimbursement for Temporary Lodging Allowances (TLA) . The Board, consisting of Mr. zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 August 2014 and, |jpursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective actiqn indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7667 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in your case, such as your prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7669 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and — applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board © considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser N130C/13U1042 dated a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7678 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect the reentry code of RE-3E (Inducted/Enlisted/Extended/Reenlisted in error) vice RE-4 recommended for reenlistment) in block 27 of his DD Form 21 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Acti ) 4 3 March 2009. ry The,,Board, consisting oa AES a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7681 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate {EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR771 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7711-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on QM and, pursuant to its regulations, determined _that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7712 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7714 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Rxnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7715 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be upgraded due to your acts of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7720 13
Your previous case, docket number 7895-02, was denied on 10 June 2003. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2014. The Board also considered the two reports of the Naval Discharge Review Board dated 16 May 1977 and 3 June 1981, copies of which are attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7727 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7730 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...