NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05086-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Under the terms of your enlistment contract, you were required to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05087-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05093-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05094-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 Marine 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05098-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval, record be corrected to show that Petitioner elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for her sister under the insurable interest category. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05099-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05107-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05109-09
2 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Navy Reserve on 4 March 2008. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 July 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05111-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 August 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05116-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05120-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments), “When he applies ‘himself he performs above average as compared to his peers.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05127-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05128-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. The Board noted that there was no evidence in your record to support your contention that you were separated for a different reason. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05130-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USN vice USNR. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2009 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05135-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference {a} for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05139-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ‘Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05145-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 9 July 2002 to 27 January 2003, a copy of which is at Tab A. She further requested removing her failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Major Selection Board and adjusting the date of rank and effective date of her promotion to major...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05149-09
- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DCG 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5149-09 12 February 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER igi > REVIEW , OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) Subject’s naval record (2) CNPC memo of 30 Nov 09 4. Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa}, Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05152-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05153-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2009. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. In this regard, an RE~4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05154-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05157-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05158-09
7 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Additionally the Enlisted Master File (EMF) does not indicate the petitioner has reenlisted. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05159-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is’ an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05160-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. The ADB voted to separate you due to your misconduct with a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05164-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 May 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05169-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 10 October 2007 to 30 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the following fitness report and related material: Period of Report From To 10 Oct 07 30 Mar 08 ‘Date of Report 17 Jul 08 b. e....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05174-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested report for 1 January to 23 May 2007. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05182-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05183-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05184-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05189-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05202-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05206-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05208-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as she was not married. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05209-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05221-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No, 5221-09 9 September. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Public Law 105-85 enacted on 18 November 1997, authorized SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP participation during the one-year period beginning on.the second anniversary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05222-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH)at the without dependent rate. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 June 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05223-09
Your request was approved by the discharge authority; and you received a discharge under other than honorable conditions. It found your contention insufficient to warrant corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05231-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After being informed of the recommendation, you waived the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05242-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20376-5100 BAN Docket No. 05242-09 6 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: . Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05243-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Patitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05253-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and , applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05255-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were released from active duty on 25 January 1996 and transferred to the Navy Reserve and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05261-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears that you were subsequently processed for separation by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05269-09
A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive séssion, considered your application on 5 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05271-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05278-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the “Proficiency” /*Conduct” Marks assigned for 31 January and 31 July 2008, “3.2"/"3.2" and “3.7°/"4.3," respectively (copy of pertinent data from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) is in enclosure (2)). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05281-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After consulting with legal counsel, you elected to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05284-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...