NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03042-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is not indebted for his travel from Misawa, Japan to Zambalas, Philippines, his Home of Record (HOR) for emergency leave. G.L.ADAMS Head, Pay Section Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03078-04
In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1). Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03101-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible and show transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in paygrade E-3.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03124-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03171-04
Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03214-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) allows payment of BAH at dependent location under certain circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03245-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CS rating. Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03279-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03412-04
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03418-04
03418-04 18 March 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your late husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member pa el of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting n executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, our husband’s naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03512-04
Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CMC w/o enclosures In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03552-04
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 3552-04 11 August 2004This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2004. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03592-04
In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. The Regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy, require that the naval record of subject to be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the approved recommendation of the Board as contained in enclosure (1). Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03607-04
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 3607-04 19 May 2004 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Chief of Naval Personnel Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03611-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was released to member on 26 September 2001 offering him the opportunity to elect the REDUX retired pay system and receive a $30,000 CSB by his 15th anniversary of active duty. The member’s CSB GENADMIN notification messages as well as NAVADMIN 245 01 nd NAVADMIN 344/702 clearly notified him...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03641-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes. In addition, die Board considered th~ advisory opinion furnished by a designee of the Specialty Leader for Psychiatry dated 5 January 2003, a copy of which is attached, and the comments of your counsel in response thereto.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03696-04
That Subject’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: In accordance with reference (a), the Board for Correction of Naval Records has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in the naval record of the subject. G. L. ADAMS Head, Pay Section Copy to: DFAS w/o enclosures CNP w/o enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03702-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2005. The Board rejected your contention to the effect that a civilian medical record demonstrates that you were not intoxicated when you caused an automobile accident on 7 November 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03872-04
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of $30,000.00. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03919-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 November 2000. Subsequently, on 4 October 2001...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03925-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the fitness reports for 1 January to 1 April 2002, 2 April to 22 June 2002, 23 June to31 December 2002, 1 January to 30 June 2003, and 1 July to26 August 2003. We do not, however, recommend that his voided MOS 8411 be reinstated and the recoupment of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03953-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Accordingly, your application has been denied.The Board did not consider whether the reason for your separation should be changed because you did not request such action and have no exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03999-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with 1 material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injusticeThe Board found that you entitledSeptember 1998. The record ref lets that o 14 April 2000 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04007-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of$30,000.00.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Prevatt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04052-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating(NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04057-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, theBoard noted that even if your back and neck disabilities were to be classified as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04079-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 June 2001 as a petty officer second class (DK2; E-5). However,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04130-04
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE 4. Hence, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it does not appear that petitioner’s Migraine Headaches were due to the Seizure condition for which he was determined to have been unfit by the PEB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04222-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 7 December 1971. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04234-04
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 17 May 2004, and the advisory opinion from the HQMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, Personnel Management Division, dated 2 April 2004, copies of which are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04235-04
The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the avialable evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04238-04
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Haney, Schultz and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2004, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04249-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner accepted his commission effective 1 May 2002.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04272-04
h. Petitioner states he was told that if the charges were 2 dismissed, he could return to the Marine Corps. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in the reason for discharge. c. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04277-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an extension.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04282-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04411-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show termination of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04420-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show corrected to show Petitioner made a timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay System and is entitled to a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB) in the amount of$30,000.00.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Prevatt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04444-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your current application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board’s files on your previous case and your previous reconsideration request, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the memorandum for the record dated 28 July 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04458-04
The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Subject’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04468-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Nicholson, and Ms. Gilbert,, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04473-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse and child coverage, vice child only.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Neuschafer, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Prevatt reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 August 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04516-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2.The Board, consisting of Mr.and Ms. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error an injusticeon 27 July 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Since he is now serving well in the National Guard and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04582-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04611-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04617-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientious conserdation of theentire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice YouenlistedtheMarine Corps on 5 July 1968 at age 17. Additionally, on 28 October 1968, during a physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04634-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Career Sea Pay Premium (CSPP) entitlement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dawson and Dunne reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 August 2004 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04635-04
A review of Annex A to DD Form 4 reveals that he was not guaranteed an EBCC. He is therefore not entitled to receive an EBCC. Per enclosure (1) and reference (a), Applicants with college level foreign education who have satisfactorily completed the U.S. equivalent of 45 semester hours at a college or university accredited for post secondary education, may be enlisted as an in paygrade E-3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04659-04
On 20 August 1979 you were released from active duty and assigned to a Marine Corps Reserve unit. At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE—4.Character of service is based, in part, on one’s conduct and proficiency averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. A review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning repeated tardiness to morning muster, positive urinalysis results indicating illegal use of THC and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04714-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statute s, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant t demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a request comments and recommendations in subject’s case.