ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007223
On 16 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that he was advised the Article 15 would be expunged from his record.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007227
On 6 April 1999, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007229
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 2 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007229 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Presiding Officer I certify that herein is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007244
The unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct; specifically for: a. demonstrating consistent discipline and behavioral problems, despite numerous counseling and failing to improve. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007249
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007249 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007261
On 8 August 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The record of evidence contains a positive urinalysis report coded CO (Command Directed), dated 1 May 2003. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007317
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of a serious offense. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007334
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 9 April 2010, for 8 years. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the document and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The records show the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case and an under other than honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007338
On 20 December 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The records show the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007342
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code. On 16 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 25 February 2011, with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007343
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5-17, for a physical condition which was not a disability and received a characterization of service of honorable. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the documents submitted with the application, there are...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007344
Based on the above misconduct, the commander recommended a general, under other than honorable conditions, discharge. The separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, on an unspecified date. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007354
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record. Moreover, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that she was told by her chain of command that she would receive an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007357
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 10 December 2008, the unit commander, notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. On 22 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007358
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007358 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. A characterization of under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007361
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level status was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability, with character of service described as general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007383
The applicant was separated from the Army on 27 April 2011, with an uncharacterized discharge. The record contains two negative counseling statements, dated 1 April 2011 and 4 April 2011, for being recommended for Chapter 11, entry level separation for his inability to adapt to military service and unsatisfactory performance, lack of reasonable effort and failure to adapt. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007412
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 11 January 2013, the unit commander recommended separation from the Service under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized conditions discharge. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007417
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 31 March 2008, the unit commander, notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. On 30 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007419
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 15 November 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007419 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Presiding Officer I certify that herein...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007426
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT The applicant provided a DD Form 149, DD Form 1059, DD Form 214, CAB orders, and five certificates/diplomas. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007432
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 31 October 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 3rd BCT, 4th IN Div, Fort Carson, CO f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 14 July 2004, 3 years and 22 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 10 months, 21 days h. Total Service: 10 months, 21 days i. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 31 October 2011, with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007434
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 November 2006 for a period of 5 years, 19 weeks. On 17 June 2011, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge as shown by the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007451
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 15 November 2011 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Pattern of Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 601st AV Spt, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 2 July 2008, 4 years and 45 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 4 months, 14 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 4 months, 14 days i. On 17 October 2011, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007453
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007454
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 18 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007454 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests his general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007461
She was 20 years old at the time of her reenlistment and had a high school letter. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007468
Prior Board Review: No SUMM6ARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 July 2009, for a period of 4 years. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 12 March 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), by wrongfully using Oxymorphone between (111217 and 120117). However, a DD Form 214...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007472
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 27 April 2000 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 2/7th Infantry, Fort Stewart, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 4 January 1996, 3 years, 17 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 1...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007479
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and informed the applicant of his rights. On 27 February 2002, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT The applicant provided a self authored statement dated 18 March 2013, copy of his DD Form 214 for the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007514
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 11 April 2012, for a period of 8 years. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. Soldiers being processed for separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007515
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130007515 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The DD Form 214 indicates that on 4 October...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007554
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 30 May 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 94th Bde Spt Bn, Fort Polk, LA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 April 2005, 4 years and 17 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 1 month, 11 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 1 month, 11 days i. On 14 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007573
DD Form 4/1 Enlistment/Reenlistment Document dated 8 January 2008, that shows the applicants 1st enlistment. DD Form 4/1 Enlistment/Reenlistment Document dated 16 April 2010, that shows the applicant reenlisted and allied documents, DD Form 3286 Statement for Enlistment and DA Form 3340-R dated 15 April 2010, Request for Reenlistment or Extension in the Regular Army. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: A DD Form 293 dated 15 April 2013.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007581
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was rated as Among the Best on one report and Fully Capable on three reports by his raters and received a 2/1, two 2/2, and a 3/3 rating from his senior rater (SRs) for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007592
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 21 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), specifically for having participated in the consumption and/or usage of marijuana. On 28 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007593
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates on 19 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs. On 25 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends he was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007604
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The applicant requests a change to his separation code and narrative reason for his discharge. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided the following documents in support of his petition: a. DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) dated, 10 April 2013. b.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007606
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. He asked to change his military occupational specialty (MOS) and was told that he had to re-enlist first to talk over other options. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 September 2005, for a period of 5 years and 20 weeks.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007609
The applicant requests to upgrade his characterization of service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable, and to change the narrative reason for his discharge. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the narrative reason for his discharge. The DD Form 214 also...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007630
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided an online application, dated 12 April 2013, and his DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007649
He was a good Soldier who just wanted to graduate and become a US Army Infantry Soldier. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The Regulation also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007696
The DD Form 214 indicates that on 21 March 2012, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, dated 16 April 2013; a DD Form 214, discharge orders, and a self-authored statement. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007699
On 14 December 2011, the separation authority and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. While the applicants commander notified her, in part, her separation was due to smoking Spice, her discharge was for misconduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007702
She states she has 11 years and 4 months of good service and requests a review of her military records to upgrade her discharge to honorable. On 26 September 2012, the commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(2), misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs. On 16 October 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007739
On 10 February 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the document and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007745
The evidence indicates the applicant in accordance with AR 635-200, was entitled to a hearing before an administrative separation board because he had 6 or more years of total active and reserve service on the date of initiation of recommendation for separation. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 22 February 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007747
Based on the above misconduct, the unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the issue he was unjustly discharged or his discharge was inequitable. However, this issue is not a matter upon which the Army Discharge Review Board grants a change in discharge because it raises no matter of fact, law, procedure, or discretion...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007748
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 December 1986 for a period of 3 years. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT The applicant provided a DD Form 293, six NCOERs, three ARCOMs, two AAMs, three Certificate of Achievements, a college transcript, two diplomas from East Arkansas Community College, a memorandum from the Department of Veterans Affairs (PTSD), and a DD Form 214. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the presumption...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007749
The Board found the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his combat service, and the circumstances surrounding his discharge, mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 15 June 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense), specifically...