ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006333
Applicant Name: ????? However, the record does contain the administrative separation board proceedings that recommend the applicant for separation from the North Carolina Army National Guard. Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-78 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006337
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board), and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On2 September 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006365
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b, AR 635-200, by pattern of misconduct for derelict in his duty x2 on (060817 and 061018), disobeyed a lawful order x3 on (061024, 061013, and 080207) and failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty x3 (071210, 080205 and 080211) and operated a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006374
On 15 January 1997, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of her case by an administrative separation board. On 4 June 1997, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service as honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006379
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006382
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure to meet the minimum standards on two consecutive record Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) (061031) and (070509), the characterization of service is not in the file. The analyst noted that on the applicant's DD Form 214 block 24, "Character of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006383
Applicant Name: ????? Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Based on this evidence the Board found that the applicants misconduct was mitigated by the circumstances surrounding her discharge, that being, the applicant had requested a hardship discharge due to a family situation.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006385
The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 12b by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the applicants available record of service during the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006388
Applicant Name: ????? The senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 2 April 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006390
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 July 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006392
Paragraph 8-26(n) of that regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for failing to report to IADT phase 1 or 2. Soldiers completing Phase I BT or basic combat training (BCT) remain in entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006396
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 1 May 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006397
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicants available service record, the analyst found that these documents did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006399
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, in that he received a counseling statement on (070905) for his several offenses of being arrested for driving while intoxicated, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006401
On 27 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006404
That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 24b (3) by reason of disability, severance pay, with an honorable characterization of service. Paragraph 4-24b(3) provides that Soldiers not having sufficient time in service for retirement would be separated by reason of disability with severance pay. The PEB would have recommended separation with severance pay.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006405
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006406
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine x 4 on (051109), (051212), (060120), (060131); disobeyed a lawful order from a CPT and communicated a threat to a CPT, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006407
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the issues that the applicant submitted are not a matter on which the Army Discharge Review Board grants a change in discharge because it raises no matter of fact, law, procedure, or discretion relating to the discharge process nor is it associated with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006409
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006410
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 August 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006412
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 August 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006413
Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The Army Discharge Review Board is empowered to change the characterization of the discharge only if clemency is determined to be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006415
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 April 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006416
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with general, under honorable conditions discharge. However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006417
The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12b for pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the applicants available record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006418
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 December 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he did on numerous occasions, disobeyed and disrespected non-commissioned officers, and on 8 November 2001, he was convicted by Summary Court-Martial for disobeying a Commissioned Officer, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006419
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for numerous violations of the UCMJ with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006420
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKK (i.e., misconduct (Drug Abuse)).
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006422
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006423
Applicant Name: ????? Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20090006423 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006425
On 18 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions . Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006426
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that the applicant was discharged by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006429
On 7 July 2004, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the term of service under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006433
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 February 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor on or about 8 December 2006, wrongfully violated a lawful General Regulation by wrongfully possessing or consuming alcohol while on a field exercise with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Further, the applicant was discharged under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006438
On 7 June 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the applicants military records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006440
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Forms 293 and 149 submitted by the Applicant. On 18 May 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions; however, the analyst noted that the applicant's current DD 214 indicates that he received an honorable discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue and determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006442
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006443
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006444
The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation 635-40. The narrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006449
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006452
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf which was not found in the available records. On 13 January 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006459
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006463
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 October 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006467
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006471
The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence. The Army Discharge Review Board is empowered to change the characterization of the discharge only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006471.
The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence. The Army Discharge Review Board is empowered to change the characterization of the discharge only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006474
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006478
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants available documents contained in the record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommend to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006484
Applicant Name: ?? The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life to include his current service in the National Guard; however, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...