ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012986
He states he submitted three Special Neuropsychiatric Examinations and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), but this evidence was never presented to the Board for consideration. The applicant has provided new evidence that will be considered by the Board. The evidence of record shows that prior to the applicant's separation in March 1970, competent medical authority determined that he was then medically qualified for separation with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012988
National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 127 AR, dated 16 May 2006, awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the grade of second lieutenant, effective 30 March 2006. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012991 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Fields Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant received considerable leniency in the characterization of his service in that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012992
The applicant states, in effect, per the California Army National Guard (CAARNG) Orders Number 209-1201, her Federal Recognition date to warrant officer one (WO1) should be corrected to 27 July 2004. The NGB official also recommended that the applicant be promoted to chief warrant officer two (CW2), effective 27 July 2006, if she submits documents to the Army Board for Correction of Military Record reflecting completion of the Warrant Officer Basic Course required for promotion. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012993
The applicant requests, in effect, he be issued a new DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to include the award of the Legion of Merit in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized). Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 13 February 1969, the date of orders awarding him the Legion of Merit; therefore, the time for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012994C071029
NGB Special Orders Number 8 AR dated 12 January 2006 granted the applicant Federal Recognition as a WO1 effective 28 October 2005. NGR 600-101, paragraph 9-15b(6) states in the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal Recognition as a CW2 in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2), except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army MOS certification (i.e., completion of WOBC), the following statement will be entered on the NGB Form 89: “The applicant is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013014C071029
Ernestine R. Fields | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he served as the Commanding Officer (CO), 48th Surgical Hospital in Korea from October 1963 to May 1964. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Headquarters, 48th Surgical Hospital (MA) Unit Orders Number 6, dated 23 February 1964; Request for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013015
Her options included discharge or transfer to the retired reserve. An officer (other than a commissioned WO) or enlisted Soldier who fails to attain 50 points by the anniversary of his or her retirement year ending date, will be removed from active status. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was qualified for transfer to the Retired Reserve in view of her completion of 20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013016
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013016 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that item 24 (Character of Service) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 February 1997 be corrected to show Honorable; and item 28...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013019
On 2 June 1989 the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3-year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013021
Students who cannot perform military duty will be paid for loss of military income. Students claiming loss of civilian earned income can only receive incapacitation pay for this loss if they cannot perform the job they were doing when they became incapacitated. The applicant is not entitled to incapacitation pay due to a loss of civilian income.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013022
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. It states, in pertinent part, that separation under this chapter applies to Soldiers who are in an entry level status and, before the date of the initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty and have demonstrated that they cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013045
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013045 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 24 March 2002 to show award of the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal and a second...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013046
Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that he was wounded a second time by hostile action, and that he was treated by medical personnel for a second wound which was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient basis upon which to award the Purple Heart with First Oak Leaf Cluster to the applicant in this case. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and correction of his military records to show this award. Therefore, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013047
Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Special Orders Number 204 AR, dated 10 August 2006, show the applicant was granted Federal Recognition for promotion to captain in the JAG Corps effective 10 August 2006. The opinion points out that in accordance with ROPMA the effective date of promotion and DOR of an officer who is promoted under the position vacancy system will be the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal Recognition based on the approved...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013050
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, the Separation Pay Worksheet and the advisory opinion from DFAS verify he was entitled to $40,374.00 disability severance pay. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "DISABILITY SEVERANCE PAY - $53832.00" from item 18 on his DD Form 214; and b. adding the entry "DISABILITY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013055
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an UOTHC discharge is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013059
Although she was transferred to a maintenance officer (CPT) position on 1 October 2004, she did not have the 2 years minimum TIG required for promotion consideration to CPT in 2004. On 26 May 2006, the State FREB approved the applicant's promotion to CPT, OD based on position vacancy. The applicant was not entitled to promotion to CPT until she was extended Federal recognition in an approved promotion vacancy promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013064
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reenlistment (RE) Code be changed from RE-3 to RE-1 and that a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) [sic] be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). He also states that he did not know he was able to request this change until 31 August 2006. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 14 October 1992, for 3 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013066
The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge (DD). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of his separation, 12 June 1984, shows that he was separated with a DD under the provisions of paragraph 3-10, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013068 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) of his 3 May 1972 separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013071
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, these orders do not provide any evidence to show that the applicant was not AWOL and the Article 15 rendered was inaccurate or unjust. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013074C071029
On 1 November 1962, the applicant was separated with an UD under the provisions of Section III, Army Regulation 635-206, by reason of civil conviction. Section III of that regulation prescribed the standards and procedures for processing cases of individuals who, during their current term of active military service, had been convicted by a civil court. An UD was normally considered appropriate for members separating under this provision of the regulation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013076
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Report of Separation from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his seven awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to remove the duplicate award of the National Defense Service Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013079
There is no evidence showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade to his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013080C071029
The evidence of record confirms that after the applicant successfully completed training, he failed to show up for overseas movement to the RVN. After a thorough and comprehensive review of the applicant’s military service record, it is concluded that given his short and undistinguished record of military service, coupled with the seriousness of the offense for which he was convicted, clemency would be inappropriate in this case. In order to justify correction of a military record, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013081
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013081 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013084
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 27 January 2000, while still in Baumholder, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years and assignment to Fort Knox. The Army system requires that the soldier only be rated as the condition(s) exist(s) at the time of the PEB hearing.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013085
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record in this case also fails to show the applicant was ever wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and/or that he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013086
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013086 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant did not file within the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013088C071029
His disciplinary history includes his acceptance of non-judicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on three separate occasions. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate for members separated under these provisions of the regulation. The separation authority may authorize a GD or HD if warranted based on the members overall record of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013090C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB); and that correction of his separation document (DD Form 214). The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his retirement shows, in Item 12f (Foreign Service), the he completed 4 years, 5 months, and 23 days of overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (16 July 1975-26 June 1981). Item 13 will contain all authorized award, as contained in the Army's awards regulation, for all periods of service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013094
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show credit for service in the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B10 during the period 24 July 1994 through 8 August 1996; the Primary Leadership Development Course Class 04-98 (11 February - 13 March 1998); two awards of the Army Achievement Medal [correctly shown as the Army Achievement Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster]; and award of the Army Commendation Medal. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013096
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013096 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. At the time the applicant entered into his ROTC contract, he further acknowledged his understanding that if he failed to complete the educational requirements of his agreement or was disenrolled from the ROTC program,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013100
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error that occurred on 22 May 1970, the date of his separation. His punishment for this offense was a reduction to private first class (PFC).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013103
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013103 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his uncharacterized discharge be changed to an honorable discharge. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 24 February...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013106
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 9 December 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and directed he receive an UOTHC discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013110
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. His DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with (1960) Device, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Army Commendation Medal as authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013111
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is also no evidence in the available military records that shows that he was ever wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. While the Board does not doubt the veracity of the applicants contention that the vehicle accident that he was involved in on 26 July 1971 while serving in Vietnam was caused by a sniper, there is no evidence in the applicants available military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013114C071029
On about 16 November 1967, the applicant's commander recommended that he appear before a board of officers for the purpose of determining whether he should be discharged before the expiration of his term of service for unfitness. He waived consideration of his case by a board of officers and waived a personal appearance before a board of officers. Evidence of this incident was not found in the applicant's record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013120
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held and satisfactorily served on active duty in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 from 25 January 1974 through 29 April 1975. Thus, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicants record to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and pay grade of SSG/E-6 on 5 November 1990, and by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013121
The DD Form 214, issued on 24 July 2006 indicates the following: a. the applicant entered active duty for this period on 10 June 1995 and was separated with 11 years, 1 month, and 15 days of active service this period on 24 June 2006; b. she had 9 years, 1 month, and 11 days of prior active service with 5 years, 4 months, and 9 day of inactive service; and c. she was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 3-5 with a separation code of FND...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013124
The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that his election to receive Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) was honored and, as a result, that he received CRSC instead of Concurrent Retirement Disability Payment (CRDP) from January 2004. When he submitted inquiries into why he was receiving CRDP and not CRSC, he was told that In CRDP was an automatic entitlement and that CRDP was more beneficial to him. However, the applicant was awarded CRSC...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013125
On 24 May 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) by reason of misconduct pattern of misconduct, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The board recommended separation by reason of a pattern of misconduct with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. This Board found insufficient evidence to show the applicant's quality of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013126
For example, an 11B assigned to an infantry battalion is not eligible for award of the CAB. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was assigned to a civil affairs battalion at the time he was awarded the Combat Action Badge. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013131C071029
The Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract entered into by the applicant on 5 December 1994, specified, in Item 3-d, that the applicant would be obligated to serve two, three, or four years on active duty as a commissioned officer in the United States Army as prescribed by relevant Army regulations based on the needs of the Army, followed by service in the Reserve Components (RC) until the remainder of her 8-year MSO had been served. On 7 January 2001, upon completion of 4 years and 1...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013139
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013141
The applicant essentially stated that it was the FSMs intent to provide her with annuity payments under the RCSBP; however, as he was not eligible to receive retired pay at the time of his death, there is no record of RCSBP premiums being paid by the FSM after his divorce from the applicant, which could confirm his intent to continue providing RCSBP coverage for her. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013144
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting that his UOTHC discharge be changed to an uncharacterized discharge based on the fact under current standards if he were discharged he would have received an entry level discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant at the time confirms he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013147
The applicant states that he was wounded, on 1 October 1967, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart because of injuries sustained while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.