AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05172
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: We have carefully reviewed the applicants submission and the evidence of record and do not find a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely filing of this application. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05173
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) and corresponding separation code (JHJ) be changed to a medical reason. In support of the applicants appeal, she provides medical documentation, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and other documentation. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05176
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05176 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Albuquerque, NM. The place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05179 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05180
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05180 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the citation to accompany the award of the Purple Heart (PH) medal. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the Special Order and the certificate awarding the PH. Applicant's Available Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05185
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made his RCSBP election when he entered retired status. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05186 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report (OPR) (Lt thru Col), rendered for the period 16 September 2012 through 26 June 2013, be filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her final OPR from the Joint Staff, corrected DMSM, or the correct version of her PRF were not timely submitted to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Senior Aircrew Member Badge, rather than the Aircrew Member Badge. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05191
The medical condition has been validated through a medical evaluation. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05193
Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be documented in the service member's medical and/or health record. The applicant's official military personnel records do not include any documents indicating he was recommended for or awarded the PH. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05198
Item 12(h) Initial Entry Training Date - 17 November 1971 Administratively Corrected 4. DPTS cannot correct item 12f due to the applicant not going overseas or performing any sea service during the active duty period of service from 14 June 1999 through 2 December 2012. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05199
The applicant was serving in the grade of A1C at the time of his discharge with 31 months or more Time in Service (TIS). As a result, he was not eligible to reenlist and had to separate due to his grade of A1C and TIS. A complete copy of the DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Feb 14 for review and comment within...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05201
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he separated from the Air Force in 1999, he applied for RCSBP coverage for his former spouse. ARPC has no record of the applicant reporting his marital change within the required time period. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05203
If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non- exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Feb 14 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, we note that although the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05216
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05216 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be corrected to a 5.0 multiple, instead of a 2.0 multiple. The applicant reenlisted on 11 Dec 12 and his enlistment contract erroneously indicated an SRB multiple of 5.0 when the correct multiple should have been 2.0. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 Dec 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219
Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the members request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05220
A complete copy of the applicants response is at Exhibit E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicants request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05223
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: SAF/PDBR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice regarding the applicants DoD mental health diagnosis rendered by the DES. Therefore, the panel concluded the mental condition was not unfitting at the time of placement on the TDRL and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05224
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, dated 14 May 09, included depression as a Category II, Condition that can be unfitting but was not compensable or ratable at the time. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Special Review Panel (SRP) recommends there be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05225
The USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time of evaluation. On 17 Mar 10, during the applicants second TDRL reevaluation, the IPEB recommended she be removed from TDRL and permanently retired with a combined disability rating of 60 percent. The preponderance of the evidence favored the diagnosis of bipolar disorder at the time of the initial TDRL evaluation.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05227
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends the applicants request be approved and that his re-entry (RE) code be updated once the lost time is removed from his records. At the same time, the applicant requested that his lost time be re-calculated; however, as the commander non-concurred with his request, the lost...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05230
On 31 Aug 10, she was honorably discharged with a narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service and Reentry (RE) code 3A which denotes 1st term airman separating before 36 months. She served 1 year, 10 months and 17 days on active duty. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change to her narrative reason for separation. Based on documents that are on file in her records, the discharge to include the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233
* If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05234
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Board should consider his untimely application in the interest of justice because he is 75 years old and has never been in trouble since. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05240
The court-martial was based on charges that occurred on 8 Jan 83; Charge I: for unlawfully striking someone with his hands and fists; Charge II: participating in a breach of the peace by ejecting someone from his barracks room; by assaulting that person at or near his barracks; by directing insulting language toward that person near his barracks; Charge III, failed to obey a lawful order to produce a military ID card; Charge IV, on 9 Jan 83, he was disrespectful in language and deportment...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05243
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05243 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His compensable disability rating of 30 percent from the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) be increased. The sources noted above reflect that the IPEB reviewed the case on 14 Dec 05 and determined that the condition was unfitting for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05246
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/PB recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not presented any evidence to prove the board acted contrary to law or regulation, or that his record contained any errors when considered by the board. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05250
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). The applicant refers...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05251
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05251 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Change her date of separation from the Regular Air Force from 11 May 13 to 19 Jun 13 to eliminate her break-in-service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05257
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). There is no official documentation in the applicants official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of six months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant contends that the fact that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05259
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05259 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his grade as staff sergeant (E-5) rather than airman first class (E-4). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05261
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 21 Mar 89 to 13 Oct 87 to include credit for the time he spent in Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp (AFROTC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05264
A Special Order was not provided with this request and could not be located within the applicant's official military personnel record. The special order that accompanied the LOM at the time of presentation is required to update the applicants records. Therefore we recommend his records be corrected to reflect the award of the LOM.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05267
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05267 COUNSEL: NONE CHARLES E. PHILLIPS HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was very young and financial problems caused his discharge. On 30 August 1991, the applicant received a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 6 July 2014, a request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05269
On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as Dont Ask, Dont Tell (DADT). In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge (the change should be to Secretarial Authority), requests to re-characterize the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05270
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 Jul 92, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. His narrative reason for separation is Failed to meet physical standards for enlistment. On 28 Apr 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to applicant for comment (Exhibit C). Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the type of separation, Separation Program Designator (SPD) code, narrative reason for separation, and service...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271
Vietnam service. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicants request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05274
The VSM was awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam or the contiguous waters or airspace after 3 July 1965, and before 28 March 1973. Notwithstanding the above, the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award should have been awarded during the applicant's service from 4 December 1973 to 11 November 1977 and was not reflected in his records. Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Yokota AB, Japan to Tinker AFB, OK. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279
On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05285
According to Mil Form 88, Record of Proceedings under Article 15, WCMJ, on 17 June 2010, the Assistant Adjutant General imposed nonjudicial punishment on the applicant who was reduced from the rank of MSgt to the rank of SSgt effective 17 June 2010. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a memorandum dated 6 January 2014, NGB/A1PP recommends correcting the applicants records to reflect his retirement rank as TSgt. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05286
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his spouse. 7.1., members must request the TEB while on active duty. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05290
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 21 Aug 75 discharge, be corrected to add the awards below in Item 26, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citation, and Campaign Ribbons...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05291
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05293
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05293 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Reserve pay debt he incurred for military duty performed/paid from 16 July to 13 Aug 13 be waived. In an e-mail dated 16 Sep 13, the 940th Force Support Squadron (940 FSS) advised him that his MSD would be adjusted to the date he resigned his ART position, 13 Jul 13. However, because this date was in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05307 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect that he was awarded a 7-skill level in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A5X1 (Aircraft Maintenance). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest level of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05312
AFBCMR BC-2013-05312 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05314
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05314 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized service characterization be changed to honorable or medical. A complete copy of the AETC/SGPC evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial noting Airmen are given an entry- level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05323
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05323 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. A copy of the DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05324
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05324 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Medal (AM), dated 30 October 2012 be changed to reflect a date prior to 8 June 2009. While it is noted there were significant delays in between when the act occurred and when the applicant received award of the AM, no documentation has been presented demonstrating a recommendation package for the AM was...