Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003884
Original file (20130003884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  22 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003884 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests:

* award of the Army Good Conduct Medal
* correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Senior Parachutist Badge

2.  The applicant states he should receive the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of service.  Attached are orders showing he was awarded the Senior Parachutist Badge.

3.  The applicant provides Special Orders Number 25.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 August 1961 and he held military occupational specialty 717.17 (Administrative Specialist).  He was promoted to the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 on 18 June 1964.

3.  Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received predominantly "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service except for the period from 3 November to 22 December 1961 (50 days) when he received "good" ratings.  

4.  The applicant provides Special Orders Number 25 issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division and Fort Campbell, Fort Campbell, KY, dated 30 January 1964, awarding him the Senior Parachutist Badge.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 August 1964 in the rank of SP5.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of creditable active service.

6.  His DD Form 214 shows award of the Parachutist Badge and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-19).

7.  His record is void of orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal.  

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Special orders awarded the applicant the Senior Parachutist Badge which is not shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to the correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  With respect to the Army Good Conduct Medal, the governing regulation requires the individual must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout their period of active service.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant received "good" ratings from 3 November to 22 December 1961 and his record is void of orders awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he is not entitled to this portion of the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show the National Defense Service Medal and Senior Parachutist Badge.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to Army Good Conduct Medal.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003884



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003884



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004521

    Original file (20110004521.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the Jumpmaster Badge (correctly known as Master Parachutist Badge), the National Defense Service Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant provides a Certificate of Training for the Jumpmaster course, DD Form 214, references concerning the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Master Parachutist Badge. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021001

    Original file (20100021001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008476

    Original file (20090008476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Good Conduct Medal, the Expert Infantryman Badge, and the Senior Parachutist Badge. Since the applicant's military records show his conduct and efficiency ratings were excellent during the period 31 May 1955 through 30 May 1958, it appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006773

    Original file (20130006773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015259

    Original file (20130015259.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in: * Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service), he received "excellent" efficiency ratings with the exception of two periods for which he received "good (academic)" ratings and all "excellent" conduct ratings * Section 2, he was assigned to the 98th Transportation Detachment from 7 March 1963 to 5 February 1964 * Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States), he arrived in Vietnam on 2 March 1963 and departed on 6 February 1964 4. In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009671

    Original file (20100009671.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following information: * separation as a sergeant (E-5) * conversion in 1965 of the MOS 111.07 to the new MOS designation of 11B1P (Light Weapons Infantryman - Parachute qualified) * foreign service in Okinawa from 19 November 1963 through 4 May 1965 with assignment to Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment * award of the Parachutist Badge, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam), and the Marksman Marksmanship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005704

    Original file (20110005704.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his Honorable Discharge Certificate and discharge orders from the USAR * his DD Form 214 * ECI Form 26 (USAR Extension Course Institute - Certificate of Completion), dated 5 May 1960 * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * his DA Form 24 (Service Record) * his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United states) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013439

    Original file (20070013439.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. Section 22 (Duty for Which Additional Pay is Authorized, Including Flying, Glider, Qualification in Arms, Sea Duty, Diving, Parachute, etc) of the applicant's Service Record shows that he was qualified as a parachutist on 15 December 1948 and disqualified/discontinued on 24 January 1949. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was twice convicted by a Court-Martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022611

    Original file (20110022611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 8 July 1965 through 25 June 1966; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to: (1) Company A, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry, Fort Campbell, KY, from 5 September 1964 through on or about 7 July 1965; (2) Company A, 2nd Battalion, 502nd Infantry (Vietnam) from 8 July 1965 through 16 June 1966; (3) Company C, 2nd Battalion, 505th Infantry, Fort Bragg, NC, from 4 August 1966...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000281

    Original file (20150000281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his duty assignment in Vietnam and any awards and decorations to which he may be entitled for his Vietnam service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during...