Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020372
Original file (20110020372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE:   5 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020372 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion to major.

2.  The applicant states the 31st Chemical Decontamination Company was selected to become an integral part of the 6th Engineer Special Brigade and as a part of the brigade, the first platoon landed on Omaha Beach on D Day.  He and the rest of the company landed on D+1.  On 20 August 1944, the company was relieved from assignment to the brigade and assigned to Headquarters, Special Troops as a headquarters company for "T" (target) Force, a special intelligence gathering section of the 12th Army Group.  Its mission was to apprehend collaborators and pick up enemy documents.  The company entered selected cities or areas as soon as possible following the combat troops to complete this mission.  The company remained with "T" Force until the end of the war.  He considers both those assignments to be a great honor and he believes his leadership of the company had a definite bearing on those two assignments.  While with "T" Force he received two certificates of merit from General Bradley.  He is 92 years of age and has always been proud of his military service.  To receive this promotion would be very special to him.

3.  The applicant provides copies of two certificates of merit, his Officer Qualification Card, and his WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation – Certificate of Service).



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the documents provided by the applicant are sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of his case.

3.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-98 shows:

	a.  he entered active duty service on 10 June 1942,

	b.  he served in the European theater of operations from 9 January 1944 to 22 June 1945,

	c.  his specialty was chemical decontaminating unit commander,

	d.  he attained the rank of captain, and

	e.  he was released from active duty on 28 December 1945.

4.  His Officer Qualification Card shows he was promoted to captain effective 21 June 1943.

5.  During World War II, War Department Circular 161, dated 21 May 1942, governed the temporary promotion of officers on active duty.  It provided that recommendations for promotion to captain and above would be forwarded through designated channels to The Adjutant General's Office for review and approval by the Army Personnel Board.  The policy required subordinate field commanders to submit recommendations for promotions to the next higher commander for consideration and further transmission, if approved.  This procedure enabled major commanders to control overall promotions within their commands so that allowance could be made for replacements received and the authorized strengths in the various grades would not be exceeded.  No promotion was effective until approved by all commanders in the chain of command and favorably acted upon by the major commander who had the authority to promote.

6.  Technical Manual 12-235 (Enlisted Personnel Discharge and Release from Active Duty (Other than at Separation Centers)) prescribed the policies and procedures for the preparation and distribution of separation documents during the period in question and contained item-by-item entry instructions.  The instructions stated the grade held on the date of separation would be entered in item 3 (Army of the United States Grade).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the applicant was promoted to captain on 21 June 1943 and was released from active duty in that rank.

2.  Unfortunately, there are no records available to warrant approving the applicant's request for promotion.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014937



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020372



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015388

    Original file (20080015388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Purple Heart, the American Defense Service Ribbon, and the American Campaign Service Ribbon. With respect to the American Defense Service Ribbon, there is no evidence that the applicant served between 8 September 1939 and 7 December 1941 under orders to active duty for a period of 12 months or longer. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the American Campaign Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008275

    Original file (20080008275.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests administrative corrections to his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), including 3, not 4, bronze campaign stars, and the Army of Occupation Medal. The applicant provides: a. Item 34 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show Milne Bay, New Guinea vice Manila Bay, PI.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017634

    Original file (20100017634.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show: * his correct military occupational specialty (MOS) * award of the: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Bronze Star Medal * Forward Observer Badge * Presidential Unit Citation [sic] 2. For services performed during World War II, awards will be made only to service units and only for services performed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017129

    Original file (20110017129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. A DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) to the Commander, U.S. Army Support Activity, Philadelphia, PA, dated 23 November 1999, shows the Chief, Army Reference Branch, National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), authorized the issuance of the following decorations to the applicant: * POW Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * American Campaign Medal * European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012350

    Original file (20110012350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of his father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal, and any other awards as a result of his service in World War II (WWII). On 23 January 2006, an official at the NPRC notified the applicant by letter that his office was able to verify the FSM's entitlement to the: * Purple Heart * Army Good Conduct Medal * Presidential Unit Citation with bronze oak leaf cluster * American Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020947

    Original file (20110020947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to: * change item 6 (Organization) from "Company A, 159th Infantry" to "Cannon Company, 142nd Infantry Regiment, 36th Infantry Division" * add the following awards, battles, or campaigns: * one arrowhead device * Salerno * Anzio * Bulge (i.e., Ardennes-Alsace) 2. The primary record available to this Board is the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017543

    Original file (20070017543.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders in the applicant's available service personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. It is acknowledged that the applicant may have participated in enemy attacks; however, the evidence of record shows that while serving in the European Theater he was assigned and performed in a Quartermaster Service Company which regrettably makes him ineligible for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014233

    Original file (20090014233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the FSM should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he suffered during war service and the subsequent deformity of his leg. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows the FSM was wounded or injured as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001710

    Original file (20090001710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant also states that the FSM retired on 31 January 1948, after 34 years of active service. The applicant provides the following documents in support of the application: Self-Authored Letter; Standard Form 192 (Report of the Death of an American Citizen); Certificate of Naturalization; Certificate Birth; WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge ),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000408

    Original file (20130000408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and a second award of the Bronze Star Medal based on the Combat Infantryman Badge. It states the Combat Infantryman Badge may be awarded to any infantryman who, on or after 6 December 1941, has established eligibility and had been recommended for such award. His argument ignores the basic requirement for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge which is you have to be an infantryman or as stated in the first governing circular "the...