IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 April 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019901
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add his award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states he was involved in a booby trap/howitzer shell detonation while serving in Vietnam. He was hospitalized for approximately 1 week due to the booby trap wounds. The Purple Heart was issued after he was discharged.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. Following prior enlisted service, the applicant attended officer candidate school and was commissioned as an infantry second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). He entered active duty and was assigned to Fort Lewis, WA, on 21 September 1970.
3. The applicant's DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows in:
a. in item 18 (Record of Assignments) that he served in Vietnam from 19 August 1971 through 2 February 1972 and
b. in item 21 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for the Purple Heart.
4. The Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) used for his February 1972 separation lists an injury to his right knee, but there is no annotation to indicate the injury happened when he was in Vietnam.
5. The applicant was released from active duty on 13 February 1972 as a first lieutenant. He completed a total of 1 year, 5 months, and 16 days of active service during the period covered by the DD Form 214.
6. His DD Form 214 does not list the Purple Heart in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized).
7. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart.
8. His medical records are not available for review with this case and his name is not shown in the Vietnam casualty roster.
9. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. ADCARS does not contain orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant and the Vietnam casualty roster does not contain the applicant's name.
2. There is no official record to show the applicant was treated for a wound sustained as a result of enemy action or while in action against the enemy.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant's request for adding the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X__ __ ____X_ ___ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019901
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022327
It indicated this service connection was based on the record showing a wound related to a booby trap. It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001009
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in combat. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 June 1965 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (light weapons infantryman). There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of a punji stick, received treatment, and that treatment was made a matter of official record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012936
The applicant states he received a shrapnel injury to his lower left leg from a possible booby trap while in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1968. The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart based on an injury he sustained while in the RVN. In view of the above, the available evidence is insufficient to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008104
There is no evidence in the available records which show the applicant was disqualified for this award. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the AGCM for the period 25 October 1966 through 1 October 1968 and to correction of his records to show the award of the AGCM (First Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result of hostile action in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003690
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a second Purple Heart. An undated newspaper article from an unknown source which appears to be a Hometown News Service release and which states the applicant: * left California for Vietnam on 18 October 1968 * was seriously wounded in Vietnam on 11 May 1969 * received emergency treatment in Vietnam and he was flown to Japan where he went through two major operations within the past week * was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009471
Item 24 of the applicants DD Forms 214 do not show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in his available service personnel records which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of a Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010313
Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that based on the applicant's dates of service in the Republic of Vietnam, he participated in the following three campaign periods: the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969, the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970, and the DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013650
The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010945
This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40. c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart. He provides a document titled Rating Decision, dated 13 July 1971, which appears to be from VA. On the document it essentially states: * the applicant made a claim for service-connection for shrapnel wounds * available medical records did not show any treatment for shrapnel wounds but his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000369
His DD Form 214 shows not indicate he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart; however, neither his available record nor the Vietnam casualty roster or ADCARS provide any evidence that shows he was wounded during his period of service in the Vietnam.