IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 April 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019701
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD).
2. The applicant states, in effect, he was confined for something he did not do. Prior to this his record was perfect. He states he has turned in 15 terrorists and put his brother in the Army. He states he did one thing wrong, he had a meal card while living off post. He also claims he entered the military for military occupational specialty 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).
3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 26 June 1962, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army with the option of assignment to the 4th Infantry Division and training at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The applicant received no other options or guarantees with his enlistment. He was assigned to Fort Dix for training. Upon completion of training he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11H (Infantry Direct Fire Crewman) and after signing a waiver of his station of choice assignment option (4th Infantry Division), he was assigned to Fort Carson, Colorado.
3. The record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement and is void of a separation packet containing the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants discharge processing. It does show he was imprisoned for 44 days from 19 July through 2 September 1974.
4. The applicant's record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) that shows he was discharged, on 3 September 1974, under the provisions of paragraph 13-5a(1), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of frequent involvement in incidences of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities," and that he was issued a UD. It further shows he was discharged in the rank of private/E-1 and that he had completed 2 years and 24 months of creditable active military service. He had also accrued 44 days of time lost.
5. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15 year statute of limitations.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13, in effect at the time, provided for the separation of members for misconduct. Members separated for misconduct normally received a UD. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an HD is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge (GD) is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an HD. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request to upgrade his discharge has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. The record is void of a separation packet containing the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge processing. However, it does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 that identifies the authority and reason for his discharge and absent evidence of error or injustice, this document carries with it a presumption of regularity in the discharge process.
3. The applicants record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement; however, it does show he accrued 44 days of time lost due to imprisonment. The applicants record was not sufficiently meritorious to support the issuance of a general or an honorable discharge by the separation authority at the time of discharge or to support an upgrade at this late date. As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019701
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019701
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004649
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD). The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089157C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's military records also contain a copy of Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center Special Orders Number 308, dated 4 November 1969, which shows that the applicant was to report to Fort Dix not later than 1700 hours on 24 November 1969. However, the evidence of record clearly shows that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015235
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicants separation document confirms he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002283
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The separation authority could issue an honorable discharge (HD) or a GD if it were warranted based on the member's record of service. His record also includes letters from the applicant requesting discharge as a result of his civil conviction and a Congressional Inquiry Packet that confirms he sought the assistance of a Member of Congress in expediting his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002660
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 30 January 1973. The record does include a properly constituted separation document (DD Form 214) that shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, on 26 April 1974, after completing a total of 1 year, 1 month, and 11 days of creditable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019842
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). The applicants separation document confirms he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015653
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: a DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States); DD Forms 214, dated 29 August 1968, 20 November 1969, and 26 June 1973; third-party statements, dated in 2009; Healthcare for the Homeless documents; a Mental Health Mental Retardation Authority referral, dated 24 June 2009; and emergency room discharge forms, dated 14 June 2009. The applicant's record shows he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013170
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Absent any evidence to the contrary, it is concluded that his discharge processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation, that all requirements of law and regulations were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. His overall record of service did not support the issue of a GD or HD at the time of his discharge, and does not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012199
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13, and that he received a UD. As a result, his record did not support the issue of an HD or GD by the separation authority at the time of his discharge and does not support an upgrade of his discharge at this late date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001562
This memorandum shows the Brigade Commander requested that USAHRC extend the applicant's mobilization orders for a period of 10 days to allow him the opportunity to take his leave earned while on active duty during his CONUS and OCONUS mobilization. These articles, in effect, focus on the fact that although the 1st BCT of the 34th Infantry Division had been involuntarily mobilized and served 22 consecutive months in Iraq (the longest of any U.S. unit in Iraq), nearly half of the Soldiers in...