IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 April 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019456
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all awards he is entitled to for his service in Vietnam.
2. The applicant states he does not know why awards were not listed on his DD Form 214.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a letter.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 December 1963. He held military occupational specialty 55B (Ammunition Storage Specialist).
3. His record contains a DA Form 24 that shows in:
* Section 3 (Chronological Record of Military Service) he served in Vietnam from 4 September to 26 November 1965 while assigned to the 611th Ordnance Company
* Section 3 he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service
* Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
4. There is no evidence of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded the applicant from being recommended for and awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
5. On 1 December 1965, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation. He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of total active service with no time lost. Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between
27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in
Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. A bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the Vietnam Defense Campaign during the period 8 March to 24 December 1965.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Paragraph 6d states that Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units, during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant served during a qualifying period for service for the National Defense Service Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards.
2. The applicant's unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award.
3. The evidence of record shows he served honorably from 3 December 1963 through 1 December 1965. He served in Vietnam and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. His record is void of any disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.
4. In view of the foregoing, his DD Form 214 should be corrected as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X___ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 December 1963 through 1 December 1965, and
b. adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 the:
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
___________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019456
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019456
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019236
The applicant requests award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award 2. The applicant states: * his service was honorable and exceptional yet he was not awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal because he took an early discharge from combat service in Vietnam * Army Regulation allows for the belated award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) established...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017087
Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As such, it would be appropriate and in the interest of justice to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 July 1963 through 4 July 1966 and to add it to his separation document. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022305
Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct ratings throughout his service. Records show he participated in three campaigns during his service in the RVN; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars to be affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 September 1963 through 15...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014159
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant was authorized the AFEM for his service in the RVN and his records show he was awarded the service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009929
It appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of 3 years from 10 December 1963 through 9 December 1966 and he met the eligibility criteria for the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of 3 years from 10 December 1966 through 9 December 1969. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014988
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Based on item 41 of his DA Form 20, he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the National Defense Service Medal which are not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012730
Furthermore, Section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) and item 13 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) show he received "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005885
The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 October 1963. There is no available order or other available evidence showing the applicant was awarded the 1st award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 26 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020017
A review of his service record shows no derogatory information in the form of lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during the period 9 November 1963 through 28 October 1966. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011723
The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record, Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Service medical and dental records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The records show this was for his service in Vietnam. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) * Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) * National Defense Service Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary...