Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019201
Original file (20110019201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  5 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019201 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits under the transferability of education benefits (TEB) provision of the
Post-9/11 GI Bill to his children.

2.  The applicant states he retired without being informed about the TEB by the unit administrator in 2006.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  After completing sufficient service for retirement, the applicant retired on 28 May 2006 in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.

3.  During the processing of this case, on 14 November 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Chief, Enlisted Professional Development Branch, dated 14 November 2011.  The advisory official states:

	a.  Public Law 110-252 establishes legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

	b.  The applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to his family members because he was not a member of the service on or after 1 August 2009, which is a requirement established in law.

4.  On15 November 2011, the advisory opinion was furnished to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

5.  Department of Defense (DOD) memorandum, dated 22 June 2009, established the policy, assigned responsibilities, and prescribed the procedures under Title 38, U.S. Code, chapter 33 for carrying out the Post-9/11 GI Bill.  This included establishing the policy for authorizing the TEB in accordance with
Title 38, U.S. Code, section 3319.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.
6.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, since he retired in 2006, prior to implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program, by law he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the program to his family members.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x_____________
              CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019201



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019201



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014404

    Original file (20140014404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant was transferred to the TDRL on 28 January 2013. b. PL 110-252, section 3319 (Authority to transfer unused education benefits to family members), which states in subparagraph (i)(2)(B)(ii) - an exception to the failure to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012144

    Original file (20140012144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The policy states eligible individuals include any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012812

    Original file (20140012812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOD policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to allow him to transfer his unused Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019878

    Original file (20110019878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve so he can transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. The official stated the applicant's last day of service with the ARNG was 31 August 2010 but he did not transfer his benefit prior to this date. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009751

    Original file (AR20140009751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he retired on 1 August 2010 * he transferred education benefits to one child before he retired * his retirement briefing did not notify him that, for his other two sons to be eligible, he needed to transfer a portion of the education benefit to each * he was told nothing could be done, but recently learned he could request relief from the Board 3. The policy states eligible individuals include any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010903

    Original file (20120010903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 also established the legal requirements for the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The applicant's last day of service with the Army National Guard was 31 January 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 January 2011. As the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his son while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017053

    Original file (20130017053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was not properly informed of the requirement to transfer educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his immediate family members prior to his retirement from the U.S. Army Reserve. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. His request to correct his record to show he was eligible to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009401

    Original file (20120009401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, at the time of retirement, he was not informed his GI Bill educational benefits were non-transferable after retirement from the Army National Guard (ARNG). This law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The ARNG, DoD, and VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021656

    Original file (20110021656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his educational benefits to eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result, the Board...