Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019131
Original file (20110019131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	      15 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019131 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he served in Vietnam for six months.

2.  The applicant states he was transferred from Germany to Vietnam in March 1969.  Because he did not have orders to Vietnam he was assigned as a mail handler for 2 and 1/2 months then transferred to the motor pool before being transferred back to Germany after six or seven months.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was drafted and entered active duty on 10 May 1968.  He completed training and was awarded the military occupational specialty 63B (Mechanic).

3.  His DA Form 20 shows his assignments following training as:

	a.  Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 67th Artillery Regiment, at Fort Riley, Kansas, from 17 October 1968 through 23 November 1969; and 

	b.  Company B, 504th Support and Transportation Battalion in Germany, from 21 December 1969 through 29 April 1970.

4.  He was released from active duty on 30 April 1970 and transferred to the Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).

5.  His DD Form 214 shows 1 year, 11 months, and 21 days of creditable service with 1 year, 4 months, and 13 days of service in Europe.

6.  The record contains no documentation showing any service in Vietnam.

7.  Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).  Paragraph 2-9 states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any documentation to support his contention that he served in Vietnam in 1969.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement; therefore, no relief is warranted.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019131



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019131



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018816

    Original file (20080018816.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. Additionally, records show the applicant participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003268

    Original file (20150003268.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The regulation in effect at the time provided that the total active duty service outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010422

    Original file (20080010422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam was from 14 July 1969 to 14 July 1970. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 11 July 1969 to 3 July 1970. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000134

    Original file (20150000134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While in Germany, he was honorably discharged on 1 November 1967 for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the Regular Army. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. He served a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 May 1969 should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010502

    Original file (20100010502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's first duty assignment following completion of training was in Germany with HQ Battery, 2nd Howitzer Battalion, 34th Artillery. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry MOS. This document shows the 1st Battalion, 7th Artillery, the unit to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for the following awards: * Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003407

    Original file (20120003407.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 March 2005, in response to his previous request for correction to his DD Form 214, he was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) with the following corrections: a. correcting his date of rank b. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal c. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star * Army Good Conduct Medal * MUC * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010701

    Original file (20100010701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006357

    Original file (20120006357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - he completed 2 years, 2 months, and 14 days of foreign service, with an entry to see item 30 (Remarks) b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized): * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * 3 overseas service bars * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14 and M-16) c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019997

    Original file (20100019997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 10 July 1980, to show his total active service and awards. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 10 July 1980 the: * Korea Defense Service Medal *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001622

    Original file (20110001622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his Undesirable Discharge (UD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (General) discharge (GD). On 27 April 1972, the approving authority accepted the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. There is no evidence the applicant's service in Vietnam was the cause of his misconduct and ultimate discharge.