BOARD DATE: 27 March 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019053
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).
2. The applicant states he should be awarded the AGCM because he served over 3 years before the date of his first incident that led to his discharge. He goes on to state that he desires an upgrade of his discharge because he desires to become a police officer.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Paragraph 2-5, Section II, Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that you have not exhausted all administrative remedies available to you. There is no evidence that you have applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of your discharge. Accordingly, the Board will not consider your request for an upgrade of your discharge until you have exhausted your administrative appeals to that board and therefore the issue of your discharge upgraded will not be further discussed in these record of proceedings.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 6 years and training as a human intelligence collector. He completed his basic training at Fort Sill, OK and he was transferred to Fort Huachuca, AZ for his advanced individual training (AIT). He failed to complete his training and he was transferred back to Fort Sill where he underwent training as a cannon crewman. He completed his training and was transferred to Fort Drum, NY. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 January 2010.
3. On 26 October 2010, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for wrongfully using cocaine.
4. On 28 January 2011, the applicants commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2) for Misconduct Drug Abuse. He cited as the basis for his recommendation the applicants use of cocaine and assault of another Soldier. He also indicated that the unit had no record of favorable communication or recommendations in favor of the applicant.
5. On 17 February 2011, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for Misconduct Drug Abuse with a general discharge. He completed 3 years, 6 months, and 17 days of creditable active service. The available record is silent as to the applicant's conduct and efficiency during his first 3 years of service.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of the regulation deals with separation for various types of misconduct, which includes drug abuse, and provides that individuals identified as drug abusers may be separated prior to their normal expiration of term of service. First time drug offenders in the grade of sergeant and above, and all Soldiers with 3 years or more of total military service, active and reserve, will be processed for separation upon discovery of a drug offense. Paragraph 14-12c(2) states, "Abuse of illegal drugs is serious misconduct.")
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified. The immediate commanders decision to award the AGCM will be based on his or her personal
knowledge and of the individuals official records for the period of service under previous commanders during the period for which the award is to be made. However, there is no right or entitlement to the AGCM until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's record shows he violated the Army's established drug abuse policy by using illegal drugs, which compromised the trust and confidence placed in him as a Soldier.
2. He had a duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies and by abusing illegal drugs, he risked his military career. As a result, he was discharged by reason of misconduct drug abuse with a general discharge.
3. His administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights. The fact that he desires an upgrade of his discharge so he can become a police officer is noted; however, the ABCMR does not upgrade discharges solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. As such, his service does not warrant an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.
4. While there is no indication of the applicant's conduct and efficiency during the entire first 3 years of his service, given his record of misconduct, the circumstances surrounding his discharge, and the fact that the commander indicated the unit could offer no favorable communications or recommendations, it must be presumed that the commander did not intend to recommend him for award of the AGCM.
5. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to award him the AGCM.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X___ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019053
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019053
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011268
Applicant Name: ????? This was a tested for drugs in your system for up to a year. However, the applicant's positive urinalysis tests were a result of the commands random urine testing program to maintain good order and discipline within the unit.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080301C070215
An administrative discharge review board was convened to consider the commander’s recommendation that the applicant be separated from the service for illegal drug use. The board recommended separation under other than honorable conditions and the recommendation was approved by the convening authority. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to show that the individual concerned was separated from the service with a General Discharge Certificate,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012691
Applicant Name: ???? By abusing illegal drugs, he knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020028
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002098
On 30 May 2012, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 14 August 2012, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(2), for misconduct (drug abuse), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, an SPD code of JKK, and an RE code of 3. Further, recommend the Board administratively change block 27, reentry code to 4, as approved by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20100028025
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012151
Applicant Name: ????? However, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense, which the separation (SPD) code is "JKQ" according to AR 635-5-1. b. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008943
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 November 1998, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Character...
ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140006886
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 March 2006, for a period of 3 years and 23 weeks. However, he was separated as a SPC/E-4 and the action that caused his reduction is not contained in the service record. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010908
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs, wrongfully using marijuana x 2 (090804-090904 and 090810-090910), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits...