IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 March 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110019051
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states much has changed since his discharge and in the last
17 years he has been a responsible productive citizen in society. He was discharged due to a positive drug test but he has not used drugs or alcohol since 6 September 1994. He returned to school, received his bachelor degree in Sociology in December 2002, and holds a certification in Alcohol and Drug counseling. He currently works as an Addiction Counselor at Turning Point Hospital in Moultier, GA and has worked there since 1995 providing treatment to active duty service members at Fort Benning, GA.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending 12 March 1993.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 February 1984. He completed his initial training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 52D (Power Generation Equipment Repairer).
3. The facts and circumstances of the applicant's discharge proceedings are not available; however, his record contains a:
a. DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceeding Under Article 15, Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) which shows he accepted punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, for the wrongful use of marijuana/hashish, a Schedule I Controlled Substance on 4 December 1985; and
b. Letter of Reprimand, dated 16 November 1988, issued to him by the acting commander, Headquarters, 2nd Armor Division, Fort Hood, TX, for driving while intoxicated.
4. On 12 March 1993, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. His records show he was credited with
9 years and 21 days of active duty service.
5. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is
authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
7. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
8. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
9. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) paragraph 2-9 provides that the Board begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable.
2. His post service achievements are commendable but do not serve as a sufficient basis to upgrade his discharge.
3. The applicant's record is void of the complete facts and circumstances that led to his discharge. However, the available evidence shows he committed two prior alcohol and drug related offenses before he was discharged on 12 March 1993.
4. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Discharges under the provisions of chapter 10 are voluntary requests. Therefore, he was required to voluntarily, willingly, and in writing request discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In addition, his request would have included an admission of guilt.
5. In the absence of evidence to the contrary it is presumed his separation processing was administratively correct and in accordance with applicable regulations. Further, it is presumed that the applicant's discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service during this term of enlistment.
6. In view of the above, his request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ____x___ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ __x_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019051
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110019051
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011913
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011969
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. His argument that his discharge should be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge because the Army failed to provide him the help he needed for his drug problem is not supported by any evidence in his available record or provided by him.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019656
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013308
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to a general discharge (GD). He was discharged in the rank/grade of private/E-1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012239
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The appropriate authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge on 18 April 1988 and directed his separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence in the available record to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012461
d. He acknowledges being absent without leave (AWOL) on two occasions and offers as his reasons his drug addiction, PTSD, divorce, inability to attend AA/NA meetings, and his deteriorating mental state. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 2 June 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010212
The applicant requests the following: * an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable or a general discharge * amendment of the following items of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 25 (Separation Authority) * Item 26 (Separation Code) * Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) * Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) 2. In his request for discharge, he indicated/acknowledged: * he was making the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018474
The applicant requests his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. He understood that if his request for discharge were approved he might receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions. c. Army Regulation 635-200 states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010384
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge for medical reasons. The appropriate authority approved his request for discharge on 4 November 1994 and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010036
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to a general discharge. The applicant states: * his substance abuse and prior honorable service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) were not taken into account * he wants his discharge upgraded so he can receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits and better employment opportunities * he was young and immature 3.