SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF: .
BOARD DATE: 28 September 2004
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040007153
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in
proceedings dated 4 May 2004 were affirmed. The following additional
findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the Board.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson | |Analyst |
The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated 8 April 2004.
| |Mr. Fred Eichorn | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher | |Member |
| |Mr. Ronald E. Blakely | |Member |
The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.
The Board considered the following additional evidence:
Exhibit C – ABCMR Docket Number AR2004101425, Dated 4 May 2004.
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
12. On 26 August 2004 new information was received from the applicant in
regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records
(ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2004101425, dated 4 May 2004.
13. The applicant provided a copy of National Guard Federal Recognition
Orders Number 62, AR, dated 19 March 2004, which awarded the applicant
permanent Federal Recognition in the grade of first lieutenant to the
applicant effective 16 March 2004.
14. In Docket Number AR2004101425, the ABCMR directed that the effective
date of the applicant's Federal Recognition for initial appointment as a
second lieutenant be changed from 16 March 2002 to 21 February 2002.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
5. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR2004101425,
dated 4 May 2004, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicant’s
record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the
time.
6. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR2004101425 did not address the
effective date of permanent Federal Recognition in the grade of first
lieutenant.
7. The applicant's records show that she was promoted to the grade of
first lieutenant and granted permanent Federal Recognition in that grade
effective 16 March 2004.
8. At the time of her promotion to first lieutenant, the applicant's
records showed that she was appointed and Federally Recognized as a second
lieutenant on 16 March 2002.
9. Based on adjustment of the applicant's Federal Recognition for initial
appointment as a second lieutenant in accordance with Docket Number
AR2004101425, the applicant was eligible for promotion to the grade of
first lieutenant on 21 February 2004.
10. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's
promotion and Federal Recognition as a first lieutenant to show the
effective date 21 February 2004.
BOARD VOTE:
__FE ___ __KYF __ __REB __ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that based on the decision of the ABCMR set forth
in Docket Number AR2004101425, dated 4 May 2004, the individual concerned
is now entitled to adjustment of the effective date of promotion and
permanent Federal Recognition to first lieutenant.
2. Therefore, the Board determined that Federal Recognition Orders Number
62 AR, dated 19 March 2004, should be corrected to show permanent Federal
Recognition for promotion to first lieutenant effective 21 February 2004
instead of 16 March 2004.
Mr. Fred Eichorn __
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040007153 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |yes |
|DATE BOARDED |2004/09/28 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. |125.0200.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005603C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 19 September 2002 PAARNG Federal Recognition Board. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005609C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 21 June 2002 MAARNG Federal Recognition Board. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005610C070208
The applicant states he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant on 12 April 2000 in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG) and tendered temporary Federal Recognition. There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 22 March 2000 MIARNG Federal Recognition Board. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002848C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 9 October 2002 OHARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 9 October 2002...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011124C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he received Federal Recognition as a first lieutenant effective 31 January 1997. A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 62-E (Application for Federal Recognition), dated 10 December 1996, was completed requesting Federal Recognition of the applicant as a first lieutenant in the Aviation Branch. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004378C070206
The applicant provides a copy of the current NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board); the initial NGB Form 89; an Oath of Office, dated 16 December 2003; an Oath of Office, dated 9 August 2002; and National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 38 AR, dated 19 February 2004. Paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal Recognition upon initial appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in their federally recognized status. If...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000139C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his promotion effective date and date of rank for first lieutenant from 5 October 2005 to 13 May 2004. He was issued promotion orders, dated 8 November 2005, promoting him to first lieutenant with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 13 May 2005. The NGB official also stated that the NCARNG, Military Personnel Office, published Orders Number 214-025, dated 16 October 2002, for the applicant's appointment as a second lieutenant in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008874C070208
The applicant requests that her National Guard Federal Recognition order (initial appointment), dated 20 May 2002, in the grade of second lieutenant be corrected to show the effective date of 19 May 2000. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the MTARNG held a Federal Recognition Board to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition. National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 333 AR, dated 4 December 2002, awarded the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004005715C070208
National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 27 AR, dated 4 February 2004, awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the grade of second lieutenant, effective 31 October 2003 with a date of rank of 1 September 2002. On 24 June 2005, the National Guard Bureau provided a two-page advisory opinion which essentially states: a. that NGB Personnel Policy and Readiness Division concurs that the applicant's date of rank needs to be adjusted due to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000589C070205
The applicant states he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant on 14 December 2002 in the Nevada Army National Guard (NVARNG) and that he did not receive timely promotion and Federal Recognition to the grade of first lieutenant. Records show that the applicant was appointed and granted permanent Federal Recognition as a second lieutenant in the NVARNG effective 14 December 2002. Based on the fact that the applicant met the qualifications for promotion to the grade of...