Title: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Author: CAP
Last saved by: janet.goode
Company: NCPB

Docket No. MD08-01520

ex-Pvt, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received:  20080702
Characterization of Service Received:  UNCHARACTERIZED
Narrative Reason for Discharge:  FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE
Authority for Discharge:  MARCORSEPMAN 6204.3 (FRAUDULENT ENTRY IN SERVICE)

Applicant’s Request:  Characterization change to:  GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)
		       Narrative Reason change to:  NONE REQUESTED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20050526 - 20051113  COG		Active:  NONE

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20051114	Period of Enlistment:  4 Years  0 Months	Date of Discharge:  20051214
Length of Service:  00  Years  01  Month   01  Day	 Education Level:  15	Age at Enlistment:  25
AFQT:  34	MOS:  9900	Highest Rank:  PRIVATE	Fitness Reports:  NOT APPLICABLE
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):	  None
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):  Rifle NONE Pistol NONE

Periods of UA/CONF:  NONE

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:	DD 214:  ☒	Service and/or Medical Record:  ☒		Other Records:  ☐

Related to Post-Service Period:	
	Employment:		☐	Finances:		☐	Education/Training:	☐
	Health/Medical Records:	☐	Substance Abuse:		☐	Criminal Records:	☐
	Family/Personal Status: 	☐	Community Service:  	☐	References:  		☐
Additional Statements From Applicant:  ☒		From Representation:  ☐		From Member of Congress:  ☐
Other Documentation (Describe):   ☐

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual MCO P1900.16F of 30 May 2001, Para 1002.21, Entry-Level Status, Para 1004.5.a Para, Uncharacterized Separations,  Para 6204.3, Fraudulent Entry Into The Marine Corps.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.  Deceived by recruiter.

Decision

Date:  20081009	DOCUMENTARY REVIEW	Location:  Washington D.C.	 Representation:  NONE

By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED.
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE.

Discussion

Issue 1:  (Equity)  RELIEF NOT WARRANTED.  The Applicant contends he was coerced by his recruiter into not providing a full disclosure of his previous medical history during his enlistment processing.  In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.  The Applicant provided no substantial documentation to support his claim.  Additionally, the NDRB’s action is limited to correction of impropriety or inequity in discharges and does not have the jurisdiction to investigate the Applicant’s allegation of recruiter coercion.  The NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was issued in accordance with regulations.  The Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate. 

For the edification of the Applicant, the characterization and narrative reason for his discharge are not considered to be adverse.  The Applicant was within the first 180 days of continuous active duty service, so he was considered to be in an “Entry-Level” status.  Marines administratively discharged within the first 180 days of continuous active duty service are given the “Uncharacterized” characterization of service unless conditions of their service warrant either an adverse characterization or are so meritorious that any characterization other than “Honorable” would be inappropriate.  It is clear that the Applicant’s service warranted neither of these characterizations.  

With respect to non-service related administrative matters, i.e., Department of Veteran Affairs benefits, civilian employment, etc., an “Uncharacterized” separation is considered as the equivalent of an “Honorable” or “General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization. The narrative reason for the Applicant’s discharge is “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service.”  This reason is appropriate when there has been deliberate material misrepresentation, including the omission or concealment of facts which, if known at the time, would have reasonably been expected to preclude, postpone, or otherwise affect the Marine's eligibility for enlistment or induction.  

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable.

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC  20301-4000.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023

Key:	NFIR - Not Found In Record 	UA – Unauthorized absence	NJP – Nonjudicial punishment	SCM – Summary court-martial
	SPCM – Special court-martial	FOP – Forfeiture of pay	RIR – Reduction in rank	EPD – Extra Duties
	CONF – Confinement		B&W – Confinement on bread and water			CC - Civilian conviction

Key:	NFIR - Not Found In Record 	UA – Unauthorized absence	NJP – Nonjudicial punishment	SCM – Summary court-martial	
	SPCM – Special court-martial	FOP – Forfeiture of pay	RIR – Reduction in rank	EPD – Extra Duties 
	CONF – Confinement		B&W – Confinement on bread and water