Title: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Author: CAP
Last saved by: joyce.meeks
Company: NCPB

Docket No. ND06-01205

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR

Docket No. NDXX-00000

ex-OSSN, USN
ND06-01205

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:  				20060920
	Characterization of Service:		
	Reason for Discharge:			
	Discharge Authority:			MILPERSMAN 1910-146
	Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge:	uss paul hamilton ddg-60

Applicant’s Request:	
	Characterization change to:		/gENERAL
	Narrative Reason change to: 		
	Review Requested:			
	Representation:				
	Issues (as summarized by NDRB):		1.  No issues submitted.

Decision:

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  .	
By a vote of  the Reason for Discharge shall   - .

Date of Decision:					20070809
Location of Board:				Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:				
Complete Medical Record:			
Complete Discharge Package:			

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:	
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:	

Discussion

Decisional Issues:

For the information of the Applicant, despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.  The record documents, the Applicant’s in-service use of illegal drugs which forms the basis for discharge.  Violations of UCMJ Article 112a  (wrongful use of a controlled substance) carries a maximum penalty of a Dishonorable Discharge and up to 5 years of imprisonment if adjudicated by a court martial.  The separation code (entered on block 26 of the DD-214) indicates that the Applicant waived his right to an administrative board.  Proper discharge authority directed the Applicant’s discharge after ensuring compliance with MILPERSMAN 1910-146.  

Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  Based upon the record, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy.  An “other than honorable conditions” characterization of service is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record.   In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considers the discharge proper and equitable.  

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)				19950623 - 19951112  
Active:   					

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:  				19951113
Years Contracted:  				
Date of Discharge:				19990701
Length of Service
	Active:					3  Yrs  7  Mths  19  Dys  (does not exclude lost time)
	Time Lost During This Period:		

Education Level:  				
Age at this Enlistment:  				
AFQT:  						48
Highest Rate/Rank:				OS3

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
						Performance: N/A Behavior: N/A OTA: N/A

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):  NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, GOOD CONDUCT AWARD, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON(3), ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, BATTLE "E" RIBBON (2)

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

19980901:	Retention Warning:  [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 19990609.]

19990602:	NJP for violation of UCMJ:
	Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance, cocaine)

Elements of Discharge:  [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified:					NOT FOUND IN RECORD	     
Reason for Discharge			
Least Favorable Characterization Authorized:	

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:		NOT FOUND IN RECORD     
Rights Elected at Notification:
Consult with Counsel			
Obtain Copies of Documents		
Submit Statement(s) (date)			      
Administrative Board			SEPARATION CODE INDICATES WAIVED
GCMCA Review				

Administrative Board Date:			     
	Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:	 
	Recommendation on Separation: 		
	Recommendation on Characterization:	

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):	OTHER THAN HONORABLE (19990609)
Separation Authority (date):	COMMANDER, NAVAL SURFACE GROUP MIDPAC (19990617)
	Reason for discharge directed:		 - 
	Characterization directed:			
Date Applicant Discharged:			19990701

Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:				2

Related to Period of Service Under Review:
	From Service and/or Medical Record:		Other Records:	

Related to Other Period(s) of Service:
	From Service and/or Medical Record:		Other Records:	

Related to Post-Service Period:
	Employment:					Finances:	
	Health/Medical Records:				Substance Abuse:	
	Family/Personal Status:				Education:	
 	Community Service Efforts:			References:	
	Criminal Records:			

Other:
	Additional Statements From Applicant:		From Representative:	
	Other Documentation (Describe)		      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 24, effective 20 May 99 until 26 March 2000, 
Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C.  The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance).

ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction.  You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.  Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.  

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.  Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.  

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.  

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.  With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.  

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

				Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
				Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
				720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
				Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023