Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2010/04/29 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she is requesting medical coverage for injuries to her shoulder that she sustained while a Soldier in the US Army. She no longer has a problem with substance abuse and is now a productive citizen. Her unit commander initially recommended a general discharge, unfortunately it was not granted. Her medical problem has become an impediment to her ability to function properly and get a job. She requests an upgrade of her discharge characterization to general, under honorable conditions. II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090827 Discharge Received: Date: 090925 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: Co B, 94th Bde Spt Bn, Fort Polk, LA Time Lost: 8 days, AWOL (090911-090918), returned to unit. Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090804, wrongfully used dextroamphetamines on two occasions (090520-090527 and 090530-090630), forfeiture of $500 for two months (suspended), 45 days of extra duty and restriction (FG) Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 25 Current ENL Date: 070104 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 08Mos, 14Days ????? Total Service: 02 Yrs, 08Mos, 14Days ????? Previous Discharges: None Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 94F10/Compdetect Sys Rpr GT: 99 EDU: 1 Semester of College Overseas: SWA Combat: Iraq (071128-080701) Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM w/CS, ASR, OSR, CAB V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: Benton, AR Post Service Accomplishments: None listed VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using dextroamphetamines on two occasions (090520-090527 and 090630-090730) with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. She was advised of her rights. On 8 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed elimination action and recommended approval with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 21 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the issue, and the documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicant by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the special trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. The applicant, as a Soldier had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and the misconduct diminished the quality of her service below that meriting a general, under honorable conditions or a fully honorable discharge. The applicant contends that she suffered injuries while on active duty. However, the record does not support the applicant’s contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that the discharge was the result of any medical condition. Also, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and noted her accomplishments outlined with the application. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include medical and educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 28 January 2011 Location: Washington, Dc Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214, a self-authored statement, and a [ redacted ] County Sheriff's Office report. VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. IX. Board Decision XI. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20100014423 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 3 pages